兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#5426] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) 麗君粉絲連個名都改埋麗君,不過唔同老豆生. 但一樣人靚歌甜  |
老友 正式會員219.xxx.xxx.146 |
2007-09-05 14:26 | |
|
|
|||
| [#5427] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) 老友去邊度玩黎? |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 15:18 |
| [#5428] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) Lym, 搵日同你出o下外影好wor! To share with you.  |
rcwy 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.147 |
2007-09-05 16:30 |
| [#5429] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) My new toys, to join you.  |
rcwy 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.147 |
2007-09-05 16:31 |
| [#5430] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) r : 前兩日獨自行鶴藪, 山靜人縱渺, 死左無人知..... (今日先好似有單見報)  |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 16:54 |
| [#5431] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) 但係環境真係清幽怡人  |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 16:59 |
| [#5432] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) 重加上陰雲蔽日, 山雨欲來, 天雷乍響.....  |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 17:02 |
| [#5433] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) Richard, I also buy 400D recently..Kaka |
Little_Stone 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.116 |
2007-09-05 17:06 |
| [#5434] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) Richard; How much to spend on your 28mm-105mm? 28mm is not wide enough as this equal to 38.4mm in 35 film camera. |
Little_Stone 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.116 |
2007-09-05 17:07 |
| [#5435] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) If the 24-105 f4L IS is a new one, think it would cost ＞$7K. |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 17:11 |
| [#5436] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) There is 400D kit for sale in the 2nd hand market. Not bad offer. |
rcwy 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.147 |
2007-09-05 17:13 |
| [#5437] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) Stone/Lym, My typo. Mine is 24-105mm IS USM IS = image stablizing (SAME as in 傻瓜機?) USM = ultra-sonic motor, for fast focusing. Don't know why the numbers should multiply by 1.6 to be equivalent to film camera. So, the film camera equivalent of the zoom lens is 38 mm - 168 mm, should be good for use in many occasions.  |
rcwy 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.147 |
2007-09-05 17:19 |
| [#5438] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) "前兩日獨自行鶴藪, 山靜人縱渺, 死左無人知..... (今日先好似有單見報)" 今個星期日我都 OK wor! 行o下近近地尖東/灣仔/維港一帶, 或九龍水塘都好wor. |
rcwy 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.147 |
2007-09-05 17:28 |
| [#5439] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) "Don't know why the numbers should multiply by 1.6 to be equivalent to film camera. " It's because the focal length is quoted base on the size of the traditional 135mm film. In non full frame DSLR, the size of the sensor for capturing the image is smaller than the 135mm film. This resulted in that a portion of the outer circumfrance of the image which would otherwise been captured by a 135mm film is now fallen outside the sensor. Hence the focal length is effectively a 1.6x or 1.5x (depending on the sensor size) of the 135mm based measurement. This however does not apply to a full frame DSLR where the sensor size matches that of the 135mm film. |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 17:28 |
| [#5440] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) just need a wide angle for scenery shooting. |
Wild_7 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.252 |
2007-09-05 17:30 |
| [#5441] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) Don't know why the numbers should multiply by 1.6 to be equivalent to film camera. ------------------------------------------------- It's relate to the size of camera's CCD. The larger size CCD, the higher cost. So, the full frame DSLR charges over20K. Meanwhile, canon also provide a series of EFS lens for those kind of cam(x1.6) useage. Like 60Marco (=90mm), 10-22 ultra wide (=16-35.2mm) DSLR is another world for photograph, Enjoy!!! |
taimonsing 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.11 |
2007-09-05 17:31 |
| [#5442] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) The Kit lens 18-55mm is really a joke..better just buy the body only... |
Little_Stone 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.116 |
2007-09-05 17:36 |
| [#5443] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) 7: use X 0.7 adapter is OK...off course the image quality will drop a bit. |
Little_Stone 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.116 |
2007-09-05 17:39 |
| [#5444] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) I think r's 24-105 is versatile enough for most daily filming. Depending on his preference, he may get a super wide or a tele to supplement it later on. |
lym 正式會員 167.xxx.xxx.10 |
2007-09-05 17:42 |
| [#5445] ETSC & ETRC & ESAC Members (44) Sorry 0.7 adapter is not for Canon DSLR.. |
Little_Stone 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.116 |
2007-09-05 17:42 |
