review33.com: 影音天地: 古CD機同好會

分類搜尋 移民 | 借錢 | 投資 | 物流 | 搬運 | 按揭 | 樓盤 | 保險 | 機票 | 酒店 | 升學 | 補習 | 手錶 | 電腦 | 紅酒 | 網購 | 脫髮 | 健身 | 減肥 | 濕疹

影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁下頁首頁尾頁

寄件者

傳送日期

[#581] 古CD機同好會 someone selling 303 now , be fast !		louisla 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.198	2006-01-05 22:59

[#582] 古CD機同好會
hifiman33,

You're right that CD100 is quite hot during operation. But I guess under good ventilation, it can play without any problems in 2 or 3 hours. At least, I've tried this before. (Well, maybe some parts were under a lot of stress as a result. Who knows? Haha!)

mikelee

正式會員
202.xxx.xxx.223

2006-01-05 23:32

[#583] 古CD機同好會
For all you guys interested in Marantz CD-73, the model was based on Philips CD300.

mikelee

正式會員
202.xxx.xxx.223

2006-01-05 23:41

[#584] 古CD機同好會
I think modification to the power supply is the only solution. or simply place a small fan for the baby!!

hifiman33

正式會員
222.xxx.xxx.153

2006-01-06 00:59

[#585] 古CD機同好會
My CD300 :-)

Gingers

正式會員
210.xxx.xxx.228

2006-01-06 08:37

[#586] 古CD機同好會
Marantz CD73 has the same CD tray of Philips CD300.
If my Marantz CD73 works, will report their difference :-)

Gingers

正式會員
210.xxx.xxx.228

2006-01-06 08:40

[#587] 古CD機同好會

Gingers

正式會員
210.xxx.xxx.228

2006-01-06 08:41

[#588] 古CD機同好會
Stereophile的創刊人J. Gordon Holt認為Philips CD100是他當時(1984年2月)所聽過最好聲的CD機!

http://www.stereophile.com/cdplayers/284philips/

mikelee

正式會員
202.xxx.xxx.179

2006-01-06 21:18

[#589] 古CD機同好會
我的850mkII,,,,,,,,,終於全體退役...........

正式會員
221.xxx.xxx.168

2006-01-08 02:30

[#590] 古CD機同好會
我的850mkII,,,,,,,,,終於全體退役...........
____________________________________________

yt
俾更好機種取代o左? ^___^

dd845

正式會員
219.xxx.xxx.124

2006-01-08 08:44

[#591] 古CD機同好會
Hello all big brothers

I recently acquired a CD101, however, one channel have noise when playing CD.

Could you point me to a repair guy? Thanks!

ehuihongkong

正式會員
80.xxx.xxx.2

2006-01-09 12:02

[#592] 古CD機同好會
他當時(1984年2月)所聽過最好聲的CD機!
**************************
what are other CDP 當時(1984年2月)?

music22

正式會員
203.xxx.xxx.133

2006-01-09 17:11

[#593] 古CD機同好會
CD101 is the first mass released CDP

so CD100 is a sample? then what is the other CDP existing at the same time with CD100? you don't understand his humouous?

music22

正式會員
203.xxx.xxx.133

2006-01-09 17:13

[#594] 古CD機同好會
dd845......取代機種係.........
MISSION........PCM7000

正式會員
202.xxx.xxx.56

2006-01-09 17:58

[#595] 古CD機同好會
music22,

By February 1984, quite a number of CD players have been released in the market. For details, please check this webpage out:

http://www.thevintageknob.org/DAD/DAD-timeline.html

Of course, I don't know exactly what makes and models he compared Philips CD100 with. However, I do think his comment is serious rather than humorous. :P

mikelee

正式會員
202.xxx.xxx.19

2006-01-10 02:34

[#596] 古CD機同好會
Let me quote from a current Marantz CD 63 eBay seller for some light on the very beginning of consumer-oriented CD players:

"It has been argued that the Sony CDP-101 was the World's first CD player ever available, however this is a common mis-conception in the US as the Sony unit was the first machine available to USA and Far Eastern markets, with it's debut release in Japan in October 1982. Here in Europe we had this luxury very slightly earlier with the release of the Philips machine in tandem with the demonstration playing of Polygram's first ever commercial CD's (Chopin and ABBA) in Hanover, late August 1982. The first Sony machines went on sale in the US in spring 1983, this was due to Polygram (aka Philips) stalling over the mass production of CD's for the huge US market. An early Philips CD-100 was demonstrated in Paris, March 1981."

mikelee

正式會員
202.xxx.xxx.19

2006-01-10 02:37

[#597] 古CD機同好會
from the stereophile article:

Like most CD players, this (CD-100) is shipped with transit screws (two of them) which must be removed before operating the unit.

music22

正式會員
203.xxx.xxx.130

2006-01-10 06:44

[#598] 古CD機同好會
these are the three paragraphs barely mentioning the sound. What it seems to comment is that the Philips / Magnavox CD-100 is sweeter (also means darker, less bright) than the other two Sony's:

Sony's CDP-701ES player sounded very slightly sweeter and more open at the high end than their '101. The Magnavox sounds slightly sweeter and more open. In all other respects the three are essentially indistinguishable. But that one respect counts for something, particularly when the comparison is made between this and the Sony CDP-101 alone, without considering the 701; these two have to be counted as sounding quite different, with the Magnavox coming out ahead.

For $100 more, the Sony CDP-101 is much more flexible and has better human engineering. But with the Compact Discs I have on hand, the Magnavox produces less of the high-end irritation which many people have claimed to be an inherent weakness of the CD system (and which is indeed noticeable on many discs), and does so without any audible attenuation of extreme high end. The measured high-end response of the two units is in fact identical.

In other words, the Magnavox FD-1000 is the best-sounding of the CD players I have auditioned, which only confirms what I had heard about the unit before I tried it. This, by the way, is the player on which Telarc bases their claim that their CDs sound identical to their original master tapes.

music22

正式會員
203.xxx.xxx.130

2006-01-10 06:50

[#599] 古CD機同好會
Wondering what version the Philips CD100 operation manual is...