兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#21] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 平Amp中,arcam+B&W真係好聲,又乾淨又快,可能大家都係UK野,指好聲當然係指\802以下#,802太大食. |
tomking 59.xxx.xxx.232 |
2009-08-20 14:32 | |
|
|
|||
| [#22] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 事實classe or rotel推 B&W 又係幾硬聲 + 死聲 ! |
hifi oldman 124.xxx.xxx.243 |
2009-08-20 14:33 |
| [#23] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 if so it may mean b&w 804 is crap. or you have not found out which cable can tune to good sound. or ears have problems |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 15:26 |
| [#24] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 or not enough burn in burn burn burn lol |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 15:26 |
| [#25] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 """有時好唔明 點解三、四萬蚊對喇叭 點會問買部三、四仟AMP去推""" it can be due to budget it can be distortions knowing that speakers can distort sound more than amplifiers |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 15:31 |
| [#26] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 try classe or rotel as b&w has investment in these 2 companies and are now using their amps for testing and tuning. --------------------------------------------- Is it true, has B&W invested in Classe and rotel? As i konwn, B&W use marantz for testing and tuning. Classe and rotel just under same dealer with B&W in Hong Kong |
vincentchan 219.xxx.xxx.73 |
2009-08-20 15:32 |
| [#27] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 Is it true, has B&W invested in Classe and rotel? As i konwn, B&W use marantz for testing and tuning. Classe and rotel just under same dealer with B&W in Hong Kong +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Se blw ![]() |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 15:41 |
| [#28] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 As i konwn, B&W use marantz for testing and tuning. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ or marantz uses B&W for testing and tuning. |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 15:42 |
| [#29] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 if so it may mean b&w 804 is crap. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ No! CPU8088 is crap |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 15:47 |
| [#30] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 it can be distortions knowing that speakers can distort sound more than amplifiers +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 報癈CPU同人耳最大分別係 唔會覺得唔失真就係夾聲 |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 15:51 |
| [#31] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 can u quote any speaker without distortion less than 1%? most amps can do that except tube. |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 16:20 |
| [#32] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 """No! CPU8088 is crap""" an example of u losing on arguments and resort to personal attack. also it is cpu8088 not CPU8088. |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 16:25 |
| [#33] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 聽HiFi係好人性化、藝術化既玩意 唔係個下下用失真率、??Hz-??KHz、??dB、??Watts 去衡量好唔好聲? 咁分析法 膽機、LP就肯定最衰聲唔上得大桌 |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 16:30 |
| [#34] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 我唔係話你 事實CPU8088係CRAP |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 16:33 |
| [#35] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 also it is cpu8088 not CPU8088. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 你都識得用 " it is " 叫自己 |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 16:34 |
| [#36] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 can u quote any speaker without distortion less than 1%? +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 以為你乜料 原來仲係玩睇"失真率"初哥玩意 |
MDLP 220.xxx.xxx.11 |
2009-08-20 17:20 |
| [#37] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 already commented u that u have comprehension problem it means my screenname, not referred to the person. so poor. u better stick with using chinese. |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 19:50 |
| [#38] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 """膽機、LP就肯定最衰聲唔上得大桌""" some like distortions. just like the house sound is a form of distortion. mid fi is mid fi not hi fi. |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-20 19:53 |
| [#39] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 膽機就聽失真 問題係得好唔好聽? 淨係識上網睇spec講機係唔會明 |
MDLP 203.xxx.xxx.53 |
2009-08-21 08:56 |
| [#40] 想搵 平價機推 b&w 804 ss vs tube is another subject a friend of mine posted this in another forum: """Amplifers do not sound the same... We can put that to a deep slumber. Yet, differences between electronics are smaller than we would admit to it.. I was surprised to hear at a CES ( a few years ago) Wilson WP driven by Sony receiver. It was honest. The Wilson sounded, well, like Wilson s WP ... Would they have sounded better with other amps? Maybe. It is however coming increasingly clear to audiophiles, the Room and the speakers are the greatest contributors to what we ultimately hear not the electronics or even the sources""" |
cpu8088 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-08-21 09:07 |