兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#21] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? SME 9 inch 和 12吋都用同一規格在大約66和121mm和片紋正切,如果當時的失真可以是零的話,那麼有碟尾失真困擾的朋友不妨聽下,支臂唱到66mm位時碟尾失真會不會突然消失? |
孟波 123.xxx.xxx.186 |
2015-01-13 11:13 | |
|
|
|||
| [#22] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 玩直綫唱臂咪冇呢D問題! http://clearaudio.de/en/products/tonearms-tt2.php |
billysiu 61.xxx.xxx.151 |
2015-01-13 11:47 |
| [#23] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 係?! 恭喜晒啦。 |
孟波 203.xxx.xxx.64 |
2015-01-13 14:08 |
| [#24] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 我地係到交流 (實情嗌更交),唔好曬命好喎 |
alphability 103.xxx.xxx.15 |
2015-01-13 14:31 |
| [#25] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 發燒友最幸福境界係使左錢後,可以解决問題和令自己滿足。 最緊要自我感覺良好,唔使諗咁多野查根究底。 |
孟波 203.xxx.xxx.64 |
2015-01-13 14:47 |
| [#26] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 冇嗌交。一睇你講D野已經知你有幾勁啦。請多多消費繼續支持LP器材製造商。 |
孟波 123.xxx.xxx.186 |
2015-01-13 18:55 |
| [#27] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 我其實只係用個project舊入門盤,唱頭係ortofon F F15C M Kii我諗都係入門野,其實都唔好聲,但片尾更不堪入耳,其實只係想D聲好少少啫!臂重是可較的! ![]() |
fatguy 14.xxx.xxx.93 |
2015-01-13 21:30 |
| [#28] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 9吋內圈衰聲?唔應該係9吋問題掛?!以前支RB300和現在支Graham,都係9吋,無乜問題喎! 我耳仔有問題唔奇,Bob Graham 無掛!? 最後修改時間: 2015-01-13 21:46:22 |
edn 202.xxx.xxx.151 |
2015-01-13 21:44 |
| [#29] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 唱臂 effective length, 有得有失 First thing first, every tonearm is a compromise. No exception I am afraid. Longer tonearm length will amplify the downsides and expose the weakness to a higher extend of any tone arm design as I learnt from Avid's boss Mr Conrad Mas not long ago. Write Mr Mas, he will tell more. AVid produced excellent and highest quality adaptor to accept mounting of other type or length of tone arm on their standard SME type arm board. Their engineer made me two adaptors for my 2 Breuer arms but reluctant to offer armboard adaptor for housing 12" SME V arm on my Avid turntable. If my memory served me correctly, Mas suggested to me to compromise on 9" arm for best sound quality. Just for sharing. 最後修改時間: 2015-01-13 21:59:54 |
dkyyu 119.xxx.xxx.79 |
2015-01-13 21:56 |
| [#30] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? It is the effective arm mass. As the arm length increases, its effective mass also increases. More force will be exerted on the stylus-cantilever-suspension assembly just for tracking/tonearm guidance. As a result of such an increase in force, which can be unpredictable since no tracks run on perfectly centred circles and vinyls are always slightly warped, such unpredictable horizontal and vertical movements will increase both tracking errors and distortions (more force is needed to guide the tonearm and for tracking). If the suspension rubber is not stiff enough, the action-reaction between the anti-skate and the centripetal forces will always deflect the coils in a certain way that the coil-magnetic field are no longer perfectly aligned. Agree with dkyyu Hing, all mechanical designs are a compromise. |
Thanatos 119.xxx.xxx.174 |
2015-01-13 22:07 |
| [#31] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? Whether one should choose a 12 or a 9 inches tonearm depends on the actual effective arm mass and the suspension rubber compliance of the cartridge. A stiffer suspension rubber matches a longer tonearm and vice versa. |
Thanatos 119.xxx.xxx.174 |
2015-01-13 22:11 |
| [#32] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? Thanks to 孟波, Thanatos and other c-hing for pointing out various consideration. There is a long list of factors to be considered when designing quality tonearm. Please allow me to add "inertia" to the list. I enjoy reading this thread of postings. 最後修改時間: 2015-01-13 22:40:04 |
dkyyu 119.xxx.xxx.79 |
2015-01-13 22:33 |
| [#33] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? > 冇嗌交。一睇你講D野已經知你有幾勁啦。 講嚇笑詐,孟波兄在R33打滾咁耐,我想大家都清楚啦. 其實我好少理什麼要註意調整,我隻會學基本就放低理論. 然後做實驗到自己有感覺的聲,相當主觀又何來勁呢。 >>>will amplify the downsides and expose the weakness to a higher extend Agree. 就系咁大個仔,未玩過長臂,既然負擔得起,就試嚇 經歷唔差, 因為長臂將弱點盡露,要調整什麼好有方向,不像8"舊時,調整什麼完全唔知,隻知衰聲 :P 如果不是完美主義人士,其實12" 好玩過 8" Again, 要SET好,12" 好花功夫 最後修改時間: 2015-01-13 23:01:27 |
alphability 14.xxx.xxx.180 |
2015-01-13 22:53 |
| [#34] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 咁耐楼主都冇講用緊乜盤臂頭,我地反而講餐飽 |
niceday009 120.xxx.xxx.105 |
2015-01-13 23:48 |
| [#35] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 其實長短臂對最後嗰首衰聲係完全獨立問題,老外經常有提 http://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/is-a-12-inch-tonearm-better-than-a-9-inch.160680/ |
alphability 14.xxx.xxx.180 |
2015-01-13 23:59 |
| [#36] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 大家講得咁高興不如一齊玩下思考。 問題1:假定唱盤速度絕對正確,用直線循跡唱臂和用普通唱臂播同一隻碟,總時間有沒有差別? |
孟波 203.xxx.xxx.158 |
2015-01-14 10:17 |
| [#37] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 無 |
cornercube 119.xxx.xxx.23 |
2015-01-14 10:38 |
| [#38] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 無 |
goodbye 203.xxx.xxx.12 |
2015-01-14 10:40 |
| [#39] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 又假設。 如果唱頭在唱緊時向前移動了一小步,會發生什麼事? |
孟波 203.xxx.xxx.100 |
2015-01-14 11:02 |
| [#40] 唱片最後嗰首超衰聲點搞? 跳線? |
goodbye 203.xxx.xxx.12 |
2015-01-14 11:04 |