兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#312] Daphile - updated on 21st March 2016 Well i am booting daphile from SSD :) But Daphile cant find my DAC. before can find automatically :( Any suggestion? Thanks; |
caglarborklu 正式會員113.xxx.xxx.235 |
2016-11-02 23:02 | |
|
|
|||
| [#311] Daphile - updated on 21st March 2016 Hi Lovebird.. I will check the router settings again. I am not expert user, and a foreigner living in Shenzhen with lots of communication problems.. Aaaaaa please tell me how to setup boot from ssd :( I will really appreciate.. I did try many times but couldn't be successful. This is the only way I learn from Internet. Thanks a lot |
caglarborklu 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.231 |
2016-11-02 19:39 |
| [#310] Daphile - Direct connect to a NAS without router Haven't tried this kind of network drive before, but make sure if your router has CIFS / NFS services enabled. And CIFS sounds much better than NFS in the previous versions, I guess that is still the trick in the current version. And go further... you may consider boot from a SSD drive instead of a thumb. :) |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.129 |
2016-11-02 10:52 |
| [#309] Daphile - Direct connect to a NAS without router i am using a xiaomi router with 1 TB hard disk inside. i successfully setup my NAS to daphile but couldn't success for the router? any suggestions?  |
caglarborklu 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.152 |
2016-11-01 17:28 |
| [#308] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement Thanks will check it out. |
ninekit 正式會員 159.xxx.xxx.110 |
2016-07-22 18:13 |
| [#307] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement Go to http://www.daphile.com/, you can see icons of TIDAL, tunin radio, spotify & etc. |
阿福 正式會員 42.xxx.xxx.89 |
2016-07-22 09:54 |
| [#306] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement May I ask can Daphile play internet streams, like Linn online radio? Thanks in advance. |
ninekit 正式會員 159.xxx.xxx.110 |
2016-07-20 17:49 |
| [#305] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement New update on on July 12th 2016 CHANGES on July 12th 2016, bug fixes for: Player synchronization bug of 16.06 version (audible clicks) CIFS mount problem with Windows share without password Backup to exFAT and FTP target drive Some web UI bugs (e.g. iOS scrolling issues) |
lw 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.66 |
2016-07-13 19:03 |
| [#304] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement lw hing, thx for your sharing. You have a good exp in DIY work and circuit design. Correct me if I'm wrong, I'd consider the logic gates circuit used in driving the output as an electrical level shifting device more than a buffer device. From my understanding, the closer the clock to the DAC side/chip, the lesser jitters probably induced. And I'd prefer the way of USB＞I2S in which I2S separates the clock from the rest of digital signals and the transmitter/receiver of I2S typically has less jitters than SPDIF interfaces. Nevertheless, I believe that the overall SQ may still depend on the implementation and design of the DAC and its related setup. So, just try our best to utilize strengths in the components on hands. |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.11 |
2016-05-11 15:48 |
| [#303] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement lovebird ching, SPDIF format had been developed a long time, it can handle 24/192 for sure. I use 5 logic gates in parallel for buffering so that it can drive a long 75 ohm digital cable, PC SPDIF header is designed for internal connection, not for digital output. To re-clock or not re-clock, there is no absolute answer, the problem is, the circuit should be good enough to handle 24/192 re-clocking. I dropped the idea to re-clocking. I don't use Dop as my DAC, Metrum Octave, can only accept 24/174 SPDIF signal, no USB input. I find good dc power supplies for CAS is utmost important. 最後修改時間: 2016-05-10 23:44:52 |
lw 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.107 |
2016-05-10 23:44 |
| [#302] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement lw hing, as u may know, the idea of using asyn USB is to separate the clock from computer. But is still implicated in the quality of the I2S data coming from the FPGA/CPLD which actually triggered by the MCU of USB handling. You setup is nice. Are u running DoP on SPDIF? Actually I'm not sure how better you may encounter by tweaking Daphile since you already have SPDIF buffering (and reclock?). But I think there should be some benefits on SQ since every part always count in CAS... |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.62 |
2016-05-10 20:28 |
| [#301] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement New update on May 3rd 2016 New ”Key Bindings” feature enables mapping of some player/servers actions to the keys of the compatible input devices (e.g. USB DAC buttons, IR/RF remote control devices & keyboards) Support 32bit UEFI boot (all versions: i486, x86_64 and x86_64-rt). There’s also 64Bit UEFI boot bug fixes and now the USB drive prepared with USBwriter or ”dd” is also UEFI bootable. Kernel and application updates, including some unofficial driver patches for native DSD support Bug fixes |
lw 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.107 |
2016-05-10 16:55 |
| [#300] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement lovebird ching, I don't know how fifo buffer works in asyn USB interface. In theory, it should isolate the PC clock and reduce jitters. However, when I use different OS and PC set up, I still can hear big differences. That makes me puzzle about fifo asyn USB interface. I now use SPDIF direct from PC motherboard header. At first, it seems I had sorted out the problem of USB＞ SPDIF problem. But I found that that SPDIF pulse shape is far from ideal direct from PC. I added in a SPDIF buffer to reshape the SPDIF rising and falling edges, that marks a bigger improvement. So my set up is PC SPDIF ＞ SPDIF buffer ＞ coaxial input DAC. I don't use USB interface. Do I still need to tweak the PC in this case? 最後修改時間: 2016-05-10 16:48:58 |
lw 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.107 |
2016-05-10 16:48 |
| [#299] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement lw hing u're welcome… I'm not a linux expert but just knowing a bit of shell scripting and OS principle. Agree that hardware config is one of the key factors in computer streaming and I believe you have a nice setup in your system. I agree with u that using a low power PC is beneficial to many aspects in CAS such as noise suppression, hardware complexity and cost effectiveness etc. So we picked a light-weighted Linux RT kernel based player as our choice. :) But limited by some sorts of DAC interface design, such as some USB interfaces which may induce jitters during receiving response from the PC and keep pushing out unpacked data stream to fifo buffer. The faster and steadier the response from the PC, the lower jitters to the DAC eventually. So the config of IRQ priority and CPU affinity (which could be tuned in Bughead also) may gives a certain amount of improvement on some systems sensitive to the interface response or an unoptimized DIY player. |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.10 |
2016-05-10 15:09 |
| [#298] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement Thanks lovebird ching for the info. You are the Linux expert and can tweak the OS while I tweaked Daphile in hardware. I use low power consumption CPU, so that the dedicated LPS can handle not too large transient current. Use hot spot mode as to bypass the need of router. The NAS uses LPS to minimize switching noise. The whole system is isolated from internet. I find Daphile x64 RT version is already good enough , but as you said it can be better by software tweak. Will try. |
lw 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.107 |
2016-05-10 11:58 |
| [#297] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement Thanks lovebird ching for the info. I am using Daphile on my netbook so can only install the 32bit version so will see if I can upgrade to a better PC later. |
hkfootie 正式會員 42.xxx.xxx.191 |
2016-05-09 22:07 |
| [#296] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement 想補充一下… 其實 Daphile 的 real-time kernel version 已不錯，音色是 smooth，但我追求的是真實和自然，tweaked Daphile 目的是可以有更真實的分離度，質感和細緻的音色，我所指的真實自然不是單單的高清，而是儘量表達 mastering 的所有，而很多時候 mastering 本身已有加入適當的水份，所以系統還原能力正確的話並不是一般的「粒粒」高清。 |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.11 |
2016-05-09 17:28 |
| [#295] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement hkfootie hing, u may find the relevant info as below. Dynobot is the first guy introduced his tweaks in the group. http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f10-music-servers/call-testers-daphile-16767/index27.html From my recent exp, I recommend the fastest respond should be given to the IRQ interface to DAC (irq/18-ehci in my case). And I suggest putting a specific CPU affinity to that IRQ interface process for minimizing its context switch. |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.11 |
2016-05-09 16:28 |
| [#294] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement Lovebird hing, would you share that article on computeraudio.com? Thanks. |
hkfootie 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.38 |
2016-05-09 15:38 |
| [#293] Daphile - Another Squeezebox Replacement I have been playing with Daphile since 2014. Currently running on a fanless e-itx PC with low TDP intel i7 (4-core). Apart from having my bios well tuned, I have added startup script in Daphile for improving the IO interrupt response and assigning the CPU affinity. All these kinds of optimization may depend on different hardware configurations and requiring certain knowledge on linux/OS programming so I seldom share with others but just occasionally in forum such as computeraudiophile.com. |
lovebird 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.10 |
2016-05-09 14:11 |
