兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 1. 如果部機可以由頭(CD)到尾(power amp)行真平衡制式的話, 而我則用"XLR-to-RCA" adapter 在pre-amp 去 power-amp, 請問你們會否認為這是有點浪費了全平衡的製作? (因在我的認識, 真平衡是每聲道行2組modules, 而single-ended則是一組module! 單在制作成本上來說, "真平衡"粗略說可以是雙倍成本...) 2. 如果用"XLR-to-RCA" adapter, 你們認為是否對音色必會有重要壞影響呢? 對部只有xlr輸入和輸出的器材來說, 是否有不良影響呢? 謝謝你們! 最後修改時間: 2010-07-23 10:49:33 |
阿怡 正式會員218.xxx.xxx.51 |
2010-07-23 10:43 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 "真平衡"粗略說可以是雙倍成本 ************************** If you do not use it, it is a waste of $$$. PS: your question is difficult to answer because it can be equipment specific. But in general, true balance circuitary is more quiet & dynamic. |
Kenny 正式會員 146.xxx.xxx.21 |
2010-07-23 12:43 |
| [#3] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 如果用"XLR-to-RCA" adapter, 你們認為是否對音色必會有重要壞影響呢? 對部只有xlr輸入和輸出的器材來說, 是否有不良影響呢? depend on the converter type quality, like fm acoustic may not |
batmanames04 正式會員 111.xxx.xxx.44 |
2010-07-23 13:01 |
| [#4] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 You should use XLR-RCA adaptor with transformer inside. |
timtube 正式會員 122.xxx.xxx.182 |
2010-07-23 14:20 |
| [#5] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 For example: http://www.tomoca.co.jp/tomoca/mictrans/11t-rca/11t-rca.html 600 Ohm 10k Ohm  |
timtube 正式會員 122.xxx.xxx.182 |
2010-07-23 16:47 |
| [#6] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 據我膚淺的認識, 所以transformer, 其實是一粒0.47的電阻... 對嗎? 加上, 圖中所見的, 都不知從何購買... 只知市面上有Cardas, Neutrick兩個牌子的adatper... |
阿怡 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.57 |
2010-07-23 17:01 |
| [#7] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 Transformer = 電阻 ??? Please take a look at the circuit diagram on: http://www.tomoca.co.jp/tomoca/mictrans/11t-rca/11t-rca_tomoca.pdf |
timtube 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.82 |
2010-07-23 21:44 |
| [#8] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 Neutrik also has a transformer-based adapter: http://www.neutrik.com/us/en/audio/210_1842753590/NA2M-D2B-TX_detail.aspx Circuit: http://www.neutrik.com/Secure30/getMedia?encoding=ISO-8859-1&client=neutrik&saveAs=true&saveAsName=NA2M-D2B-TX.pdf&mediaPath=D:\DATA\CLIENT\neutrik\media\products\downloads\&mediaSavedName=210_1842753590.pdf&contentType=application/pdf  |
timtube 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.82 |
2010-07-23 21:51 |
| [#9] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 Balanced 比起RCA的聲是大了 6 db，而聲亦比較行，用 adapter 轉 RCA 只是 負訊號接了去地，聲音質素沒有不良影響，只是各人喜好。全平衡設計只用 RCA，當然是浪費。 |
gingergarlac 正式會員 183.xxx.xxx.89 |
2010-07-23 23:28 |
| [#10] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 If we are talking about pre-amp to power amp, many power amp will convert the incoming balanced signal to single-end before amplification any way. So the question is whether the conversion is done better with the external adapter or the internal input circuit. |
timtube 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.82 |
2010-07-24 01:00 |
| [#11] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 if your pre-amp is true balanced design, why not matach with a pre-amp also true balanced design? my line up is all single-ended....therefore very simple. |
hktonyng 正式會員 147.xxx.xxx.253 |
2010-08-06 11:06 |
| [#12] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 用RCA一樣可以享受全平衡效果。只要將XLR輸出之1及3接橋橋後，輸出的訊號會有更大動態及寧靜度提高。如沒有金屬橋，可接上CADAS XLR/RCA轉插便可。至於RCA線可如常接在SlNGLE-END輸出口便可。 當然輸出器材是真平衡才可。 |
ringol1003 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.56 |
2011-04-29 20:38 |
| [#13] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 cardas adapter最正 |
tingmoon 會員 219.xxx.xxx.139 |
2024-07-04 12:16 |
| [#14] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 仆街丁滿！ 收皮啦！死番去古代啦！ 唔舊唔L推嘅！ 最後修改時間: 2024-07-04 13:37:41 |
CodyChan 會員 203.xxx.xxx.14 |
2024-07-04 13:35 |
| [#15] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 My preference is true balanced as much as possible. In case you may need to convert the balanced to RCA, I would suggest you may use a 1:2 or 1:4 interstage transformer. I use the Hammond 1:4 studio grade transformer with very good result. Using the Cardas XLR to RCA is NOT good at all. It only takes either the +ve or -ve signal for the XLR output. With use of interstage transformer, the +ve and -ve signal feed to the primary winding. Johnny 最後修改時間: 2024-07-09 16:43:55 |
johnnykmtang 會員 70.xxx.xxx.22 |
2024-07-09 16:39 |
| [#16] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 阿丁sir係咪考古學家嚟？ 咁叻發掘啲史前遺物出嚟! |
littlered 會員 203.xxx.xxx.219 |
2024-07-09 17:12 |
| [#17] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 I am using the Hammond 1140-LN-D 2.4K : 40K transformer. Johnny |
johnnykmtang 會員 70.xxx.xxx.22 |
2024-07-11 02:55 |
| [#18] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 Here it is  |
johnnykmtang 會員 70.xxx.xxx.22 |
2024-07-11 03:10 |
| [#19] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 Hi johnnykmtang Did you make the converter yourself? May I ask why such step up ratio? That would increase the output impedance significantly (~ x270) |
MichaelWittmann 會員 202.xxx.xxx.196 |
2024-07-11 04:47 |
| [#20] True Balanced vs. Single-ended 制式及adapter的選擇 Yes, I made the converter myself. The Hammond 1140-LN-D turn ratio is 1:4. https://www.mouser.ca/datasheet/2/177/1140-1389973.pdf When low impedance end of the transformer connects to the DAC/CD or preamp, the output impedance from the transformer would be 16 times of the input. This is perfectly OK because the input impedance of the preamp or even the power amp is rather high (25K~100K). This would be a perfect match. It is quite confusing regarding the impedance specified by the manufacturer of the transformer. This parameter is not applicable in real application most of the time. Johnny 最後修改時間: 2024-07-11 08:25:40 |
johnnykmtang 會員 70.xxx.xxx.22 |
2024-07-11 08:24 |
