兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 Thx |
behung 正式會員203.xxx.xxx.214 |
2020-08-05 15:10 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 Streamer also require DAC for music playing. Streamer with built in DAC should be poor as the two have great cross interferences when putting together in a box. |
petermok387 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.220 |
2020-08-05 15:39 |
| [#3] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 我估dcs 加dac 完勝。 |
Mouton888 正式會員 49.xxx.xxx.71 |
2020-08-05 15:53 |
| [#4] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 我用 dcs bartok dcs bridge 唔係 streamer? |
tonywong 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.173 |
2020-08-05 16:06 |
| [#5] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 我清楚 |
behung 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.214 |
2020-08-05 16:18 |
| [#6] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 bartok no need network bridge |
sm 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.232 |
2020-08-12 15:17 |
| [#7] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 Bartok解碼好啲 |
terry00138 會員 49.xxx.xxx.173 |
2020-08-12 15:22 |
| [#8] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 Bartok 太貴 |
behung 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.154 |
2020-08-12 15:34 |
| [#9] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 bartok = streamer + dac 省 powercord, interconnect |
tonywong 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.32 |
2020-08-12 17:34 |
| [#10] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 玩HIFI最大原則係，一切分家。。。。。。。。 可以分開就分開。。。。。。 |
yt 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.236 |
2020-08-12 17:52 |
| [#11] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 $$$$ 一寬三大 我都由前後biamp, 轉回合併機, 因為土地問題 |
tonywong 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.32 |
2020-08-12 19:08 |
| [#12] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 無水係第二個問題，我無水唔等如人地無水，大家量力而為。 |
yt 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.236 |
2020-08-12 19:22 |
| [#13] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 wonder if it is needed or has benefit to connect dnb with u-clock as i plan to add the streamer to my existing puccini combo. will at least save $$ for buying another bnc coaxial wire.... |
klinsmanner 正式會員 5.xxx.xxx.5 |
2021-01-02 00:01 |
| [#14] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 與其為puccini + network bridge 及u-clock, 不如換bartok再買過transport 好過, bartok 雖然係入門, 但係已經好過puccini好多, 最後修改時間: 2021-01-03 00:29:44 |
gary9413 正式會員 45.xxx.xxx.51 |
2021-01-03 00:20 |
| [#15] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 certainly puccini combo is incomparable to new technologies but it appears an art of craftsmanship/design and i am very enjoyable. upgrade to bartok would also cost a huge lump sum as both transport and clock are required (still can't give up disc playing at the moment). puccini combo isn't that bad at all so why not keeping the art piece with a streamer added for cas? my two cents... |
klinsmanner 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.146 |
2021-01-03 13:24 |
| [#16] 用部dCS network bridge + 舊dac VS 靚 Streamer 邊樣會靚聲的 I am using NB with Debussy DAC connected with dual AES/EBU which can support DSD128 and PCM384. So far so good. Have considered switching to Bartok before but give up finally. I think if you are starting from scratch, Bartok is a one-step solution. But if already got a good quality DAC, adding NB is easier and may also have good sound. my 2 cents |
bezz 正式會員 1.xxx.xxx.80 |
2021-01-03 19:22 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
