兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC 唔係用i phone,只用USB HDD or NAS 一部NA7004 好 定SB Touch 加 4-5k DAC 好 ? 各師兄會點擇? 謝謝 |
vga 正式會員119.xxx.xxx.188 |
2011-10-04 14:23 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC Squeezebox touch + DAC is better |
lfyeung 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.151 |
2011-10-04 18:00 |
| [#3] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC Agree with lfyeung hing, SBT + DAC. It gives u better extensbility because u can feed more source to the DAC. Like me, I used SBT for playing flac and Oppo93 for playing cd/sacd/dvd concert/bd concert... Both feeding to the same DAC. Also, it gives u more things to play with... Interconnect, power, more upgrade path, etc. But of course it could mean more money :p But if u like simple thing, marantz might be one. |
jimmypkh 正式會員 206.xxx.xxx.171 |
2011-10-04 18:28 |
| [#4] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC why don't use a NA7004+dac, will it sounds better? Is NA7004 function as a Linn Magik DS? If really it is a great news to me since I'm looking for a 2nd music streaming system from NAS. (I won't feel interest if it just plays music from HD or USB) How to control playing songs from NA7004? Through computer? BTW, how aabout sonic performance when oppo93 plays with a dac? What's your currently using dac? 最後修改時間: 2011-10-05 07:25:21 |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.254 |
2011-10-05 07:09 |
| [#5] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC Picture download from web-site. Where for a look or audit in Hong Kong? Is there any other devices like my Linn Magik DS for my choice?  最後修改時間: 2011-10-05 07:30:21 |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.254 |
2011-10-05 07:23 |
| [#6] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC Features Compatible file types: MP3 / WMA / AAC / WAV / FLAC Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes Control: Web / iPhone App / iTouch App Yes / Yes / Yes Customized Components Yes DAC operation mode: USB B type / Coax / Optical Yes / Yes / Yes DLNA certified Yes (v1.5) HDAM version HDAM + HDAM SA2 High Grade Audio Components Yes Internet radio Yes Power Transformer: Toroidal / El - / Yes (shielded) Streaming audio from PC Yes Symmetric circuit layout Yes Tuner: FM (RDS) / AM - / - / - / - / - USB Audio (Front ) / Made for iPod / Works with iPhone Yes / Yes / Yes vTuner / Napster / Rhapsody / Pandora Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes Input & output: Inputs/Outputs analog Out 1 Digital Inputs: Coaxial / Optical Yes / Yes Digital Outputs: Coaxial / Optical Yes / Yes Ethernet port Yes FM Antenna Yes iPod / iPhone compatible USB (front) Yes Marantz remote bus Yes M-XPort for RX101 Yes RS232 Yes Sample Rate S/PDIF In 192 kHz / 24-bit Sample Rate USB In 96 kHz / 24-bit USB type B input for PC (back) Yes Specifications Channel Selectivity (FM) 50 dB D/A Conversion Multi-bit, Delta-Sigma DAC IC CS4398 Digital Filter CS4398 Frequency Range 87.5 - 108 MHz Frequency Response 50 Hz - 15 kHz Headphone amp NJM2068 Low Pass Filter stage HDAM SA2 Noise Shaper CS4398 Output Buffer HDAM SA2 Receiving Range (Band III / Band L) o / - Signal to Noise Ratio (Mono / Stereo) 65 / 60 dB Stereo Separation 42dB Total Harmonic Distortion (Mono / Stereo) 0.8 / 1.0% Usable Sensitivity IHF 1.8 µV / 16.4 dBf |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.254 |
2011-10-05 07:29 |
| [#7] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC Originally, I want to buy a Linn DS-I, Linn Majik or Marantz NA-7004. I went for audition with disappointment. Finally, I realized Digital source, DAC, Power amp need to be separated in different chassis and power supply. I want to have a clean and simple setup before. however, sound quality will be a compromise. |
lfyeung 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.151 |
2011-10-05 08:31 |
| [#8] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC It is really hard for integrated to win separated DAC. |
CKL2 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.171 |
2011-10-05 10:48 |
| [#9] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC 見NA7004用果份Dac係CS4398 同SA15S2相同，應該唔算差，相信点都好过SBtouch内置個份，所以SBtouch要加Dac先得，論操作方便性 SBtouch 好似好少少 ...有無師兄多d意見? 最後修改時間: 2011-10-05 14:40:20 |
vga 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.188 |
2011-10-05 14:39 |
| [#10] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC 基本上，我一定加 Dac, 如果要比 N7004好，最便宜有那些choice? 加左 Dac 以後，應選那一款？ |
唐吉訶德 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.214 |
2011-10-05 15:48 |
| [#11] Marantz NA7004 vs Squeezebox Touch + DAC 唐吉訶德兄，我用緊Wyred4Sound DAC1。佢比起oppo93本身又或者我部LX72嘅DAC都好。 |
jimmypkh 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.218 |
2011-10-05 17:51 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
