review33.com:影音天地:其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?

分類搜尋 移民 | 借錢 | 投資 | 物流 | 搬運 | 按揭 | 樓盤 | 保險 | 機票 | 酒店 | 升學 | 補習 | 手錶 | 電腦 | 紅酒 | 網購 | 脫髮 | 健身 | 減肥 | 濕疹

影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁下頁首頁尾頁

寄件者

傳送日期

[#21] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意? 同意樓上既幾位Ching，聲音質素唔只器材價格一項決定的。我自己覺得條Formual 應該係甘： Provided : 單件器材價格10K 樓上：器材價格級數30% Room acoustics 30% 電 20% 配搭 20% 假設你一套3件（source + amp+ speakers）共值 3皮。如果間屋完全唔搞、電完全唔搞、配搭完全亂黎，出黎既聲只有9K既聲。相反，如果上面全部做到完美（當然呢個世界無完美），你就有機會得到總值10萬既聲。最後修改時間: 2013-09-20 09:35:36		evan123 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.38	2013-09-20 09:32

[#22] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
初玩hifi時有師兄講天下無衰聲器材，只看用家點玩。

用心配搭，就好聲。不論價錢。

rover901

正式會員
112.xxx.xxx.20

2013-09-20 10:37

[#23] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
價值完全次要,聲音好唔好靚唔靚更重要,越貴不一定代表好好聲.

cs168

正式會員
218.xxx.xxx.22

2013-09-20 10:52

[#24] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?

聽2013/09/14發燒玩家
訪問林鎮輝佢話玩得好
$5000已經好好聽

http://www.dbc.hk/tc/program.html?id=65

MDLP

正式會員
59.xxx.xxx.28

2013-09-20 11:00

[#25] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
唔好玩啦，砌部好小小既膽機，買對輸出"牛"都過一萬！

hakman

正式會員
222.xxx.xxx.239

2013-09-20 11:42

[#26] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
有時感覺一個完美音響系統真係好特別!人們追求的靚聲簡潔線路,越短越小越簡單越好失真越低,但偏偏就是廠商用上大量線路配件電阻電容一個又一個大量接位,重要一件唔夠!要分前後級,二件前後級唔夠多線路,仲要前後級一開三!我感到靚唔靚聲自己是否愛這音色,價位合適就夠了.
線路接位又多又煩復,是否違背靚音色之定律??

cs168

正式會員
218.xxx.xxx.22

2013-09-20 12:07

[#27] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?

靚聲簡潔線路,越短越小越簡單越好失真越低 X 2

但係需要既零件越精確，價錢越貴！

hakman

正式會員
222.xxx.xxx.239

2013-09-20 12:12

[#28] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
有時見謀些大品牌,依然在擴大器機背用上風爐(小型抽氣扇),作冷卻降溫,心想!何不將線路配件減小而増大二旁散熱鋁片,一有塵粉貼滿就増加一點不必要的臊音.

cs168

正式會員
218.xxx.xxx.22

2013-09-20 12:29

[#29] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
If one just want to enjoy music, HK$10K worth of hardware should do a reasonably good job in reproducing music. However, exceptional performance cost A LOT more. To pursue the ultimate cost a King's ransom. I have tried some "tuning feet" lately and it already cost 8K per set. Do they do any good? Of course they do. For some they worth every penny, for others it's just crazy.
I have spent about $400K to $500K in my system. But when I compare to others who had spent between $1M to $1.5M, they belong to a different world all together in terms of sonic performance. There is no short cut. Money makes a difference. Heck, it makes all the the difference in most cases so don't kid yourself that a $10K system can do miracles.
Relatively performance and absolute performance are 2 different things. Law of diminishing return kicks in very early in music reproduction and that's a good thing so most people can enjoy music with modest cost. Just make sure you know what you are going after and be comfortable with it.

desmondchan

正式會員
42.xxx.xxx.240

2013-09-20 12:31

[#30] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
#28

大師兄，你諗到既嘢，大品牌點會無諗過試過呢？！

唔好諗啲大品牌一定掙到笑，好多大品牌都已經執笠！

hakman

正式會員
222.xxx.xxx.239

2013-09-20 12:43

[#31] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
大師兄，你諗到既嘢，大品牌點會無諗過試過呢？！

唔好意思^^,袛係有同感咁大品牌都解決不到散熱問題.

cs168

正式會員
218.xxx.xxx.22

2013-09-20 12:51

[#32] 其實一萬蚊以上既器材,應該唔會衰聲,大家同吾同意?
大師兄，你可以cut咗小型抽氣扇既電源，開大D冷氣囉。