兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 小弟年80,已用並不便宜的助聽器三年,長者損失高頻,最近高頻方面更加要調高兩個dB.在人多的地方例如茶樓高頻率噪音更大。雖然可以用手機微調,但仍然幫助不多。從10多歲聽音樂到現在,畢竟不能戰勝自然規律。現在唯有多點 去現場聽音樂會,還好長者有半價。 助聽器就是一個微型 equaliser,再加一些 gimics, 平價的,例如千多元的,就是全頻率提昇,噪音更多。 想請問在套 hifi加 equalizer 會有什麼效果? 並請正在用助聽器的師兄們交流下經驗。 謝謝! |
wesan 116.xxx.xxx.80 |
2024-09-28 22:33 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 我也是音樂愛好者,同樣也用hearing aids 超過十多年了。 ![]() ![]() 最後修改時間: 2024-09-28 23:43:19 |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-28 23:35 |
| [#3] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 謝謝您的回應,我也是用這個牌子,六萬多一對,有藍牙,收聽電話或者調教音量,用手按耳機上的buttons 就可以,10分方便。我比較幸運,雙耳未完全失聰,左耳較右耳差少少。該公可以通過互聯網監察,知道我每天使用幾多小時,不能偷懶。原本公司說可以用6至7年,但最近說過了三年的保養期就不再提供保養,零件都沒有了,真是有點惱人。 提到加EQ,我請教過一位在中環非常資深的老師傅(他替 cello,AR,……做外判維修),是多年的老友記,他說幫助不大,我忘了詳細問原因。現在前級仍然用CJ 的ART 2,可以左右調教音量,但沒有Tone control.看來家裡的東西都要一件一件講拜拜啦。正如老兄所說,要求要降低,重返黑膠碟時代,(CD 日子久了也脱色)甚至考慮用streaming 加integrated,舊東西始終有小毛病,重到死,搬來搬去,無謂了。 我輩眼見由手摇唱機到今天streaming,只是數10年,變得真快。 未來有很多音樂愛好者也會變老,聽覺漸差,因此提出這個主題,讓大家分享一下。謝謝。 |
wesan 116.xxx.xxx.80 |
2024-09-29 08:41 |
| [#4] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 >>#2...."....加上EQ是...有幫助,這個是肯定的。" x2 ------------------------------------------------------------- google: age related reduction in frequency response https://tinyurl.com/4bmttehn |
cornercube 58.xxx.xxx.200 |
2024-09-29 08:57 |
| [#5] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 師兄的右耳方面,是否完全 air and bone conduction 都不行?若只是空氣傳音不行,可以請教 audiologist 有沒有 device 可以用骨傳音(耳筒放在mastoid bone上,就像他做audiogram 時其中一個步驟)。 |
wesan 116.xxx.xxx.80 |
2024-09-29 09:02 |
| [#6] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 Wesan兄, 看年紀你是前輩,雖則我也登陸了。 因我也在NHS工作,我幾位ENT Consultants 同事也給我看了,大至上如你所說的聲音傳入沒問題,但耳骨可能因受到nano stoke 而斷了blood supply, 可能短期或長期會回覆,但我情況重沒回覆。 你提議的BAHA(Bone Anchored Hearing Aids)我曾試過模擬headphone,效果如BAHA,這給人做選擇,但試過一個月後同戴耳機差唔多,故不選擇因不想個光頭多條天線!lol! 至於耳機方面因我在醫院工作,有需要精準溝通(藉口),故每三年就換新耳機兼做hearing test。 你朋友所說無幫助可能以為你全部聽覺能力己失,故甚麽frequency改動也沒有幫助,但你情況只係高頻失去,但可不死馬當活馬醫?用上各frequency 去調較,這可能給你新體會。 以你器材知識及朋友相助,可能會給你一個驚喜。 |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-29 16:04 |
| [#7] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 My typo, not stoke but "stroke"!!!! Wesan, message noted. |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-29 16:40 |
| [#8] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 #7 Or TIA induced typo instead of stroke ;) "Stoke" remotely reminds me a naughty 對聯 related to your HK origin and current country of residence: 上水居民居水上 史篤城外成篤S |
ich 112.xxx.xxx.21 |
2024-09-29 23:05 |
| [#9] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 Ivan, 你好攪笑啫,不過又幾好喎,等我轉比在澳洲及仍在上水屋企人先。 |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-29 23:12 |
| [#10] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 #9 澳洲好多英國地方名,就係冇"Stoke".下聯好似在Gordon Banks最勁踢Stoke City時多人識就作出來. 上水居民冇史,最勁Foley (廖侯) 最後修改時間: 2024-09-29 23:35:31 |
ich 112.xxx.xxx.21 |
2024-09-29 23:29 |
| [#11] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 好在ich 你,樓主wesan 及我同樣在工作上少不免和”史” “廖”有關係,故崩口人不忌崩口碗。 |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-29 23:43 |
| [#12] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 #11 亂講完,回正題. 我冇follow clinical progress 好耐, complete loss of hearing 可否死馬當活馬醫: cochlear implant 得唔得, pros and cons, clinical benefits vs side effects? |
ich 112.xxx.xxx.21 |
2024-09-30 12:15 |
| [#13] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 My colleague suggested the possibility of cochlear implant but after various consideration we concluded that hearing aids would be sufficient enough in my case. There are criteria for cochlear implant set out by NICE and I didn't think it was justified for me. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta566/documents/final-appraisal-determination-document#:~:text=In%20the%20base%2D%20case%20analyses,was%20doubled%20(%C2%A329%2C222). |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-30 16:26 |
| [#14] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 #13 Thx Chi Gor, 以前在港工作時都好多時會睇下 NICE 。 |
ich 112.xxx.xxx.21 |
2024-09-30 19:11 |
| [#15] 用助聽器對聽音樂的影響 Ivan, As far as I am concerned NICE has served well in the past with some guidelines but now I don't always agree with them 18 months ago our committee has agreed to purchase a new Cyclodiode Laser which could replace both aged units with the expansion that it could also be used for LIO for ROP. One advanced feature as recommended by our Ophthalmic Consultant Surgeon that it could perform the standard Cyclodiode laser, but more importantly it has the advanced technique of SubCyclo cyclophotocoagulation. However, after in use for 6 months our Trust had received guidelines from NICE that the procedure would not be recommended in the UK due to lack of clinical trials. Well, much clinical trials and data had been conducted by many in the States and the Continent and as such it has been used widely in those regions. That said, the Ophthalmic guy, also sitting in the Laser Protection Committee in the region, argued that after studying the guidelines, NICE didn't say "we could not use it" indefinitely. He argued that for clinical benefit patients should be receiving the treatment upon further consultation with more detailed Pros and Cons, together with a separate consent for the procedure. He had done a few cases with such technique but eventually it was stopped when he retired this May. 最後修改時間: 2024-09-30 20:49:28 |
fotheringay 92.xxx.xxx.24 |
2024-09-30 20:37 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示: |