兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#21] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... from arthur salvatore reviewing the reviewers: THE (SECRET) RULES OF 'AUDIO REVIEWING' 1. Never anger any protected audio industry entity, such as: A. An important current, or potential, advertiser; including manufacturers, distributors or retailers, or... B. Any other audio establishment which has a "personal relationship" with you. 2. Delay acknowledging any serious problems with a "protected" component until you give another rave review to the "updated" model which replaces it and "corrects" the problems. 3. Avoid making any direct comparisons with a "protected" component, but if you have to, follow these "Solutions": A. Compare the component only to older and/or obsolete models, especially from the same manufacturer. (See Rule #2 above). B. If Solution "A" is not possible, compare the component to "competitors" costing either MUCH more or MUCH less. C. If both Solutions "A" or "B" are not possible, "neglect" to mention the actual names and model numbers of the rival components that you compare it to in the review. D. If Solutions "A", "B" or "C" are all not feasible, and you must compare the model to a current, similarly priced (and "protected") competitor that you must name, then you must be: 1. As ambiguous as possible, and you must also... 2. Never describe any problem as "serious" (See Rule #3.E) 3. Never proclaim one model to be clearly superior to the other(s). In short... 4. Both (or all) of the components must be seen as equally desirable and of similar value. E. Problems or imperfections that aren't obvious (such as no bass below 40 Hz with small speakers), may be described as "serious" (easy to hear) only when using Solutions "A", "B" or "C". However, any problems described when using Solution "D" must always be "subtle" and "difficult to hear", or even described as an "advancement" if possible. 4. You must never inform readers if an "audiophile" accessory or tweak is also available in a generic form at a fraction of the price that the "protected" manufacturer is charging (Blue Tac and RFI rings etc.). 5. Any and all "transactions" between you and any of the parties mentioned in Rule #1 must always be kept strictly Confidential. Accordingly... A. You must never divulge the actual price, if any, you paid to "purchase" your reference components or accessories, or any extra costs you paid, if any, to have those same components updated, modified, repaired, replaced etc. B. You must never divulge any "gifts", "favors" or "perks" that you received from the "protected" audio entities, or those with whom you have a "personal relationship". 6. You must never mention the actual costs, even at retail prices, of the parts that are used to manufacture the component. 7. Further to Rules #4 & #6, you must never state, or even imply, that any component or accessory is "over-priced". 8. The more corrupt your magazine is, the more you shall proclaim your honesty. 9. Magazines shall never divulge the actual percentage of their advertising revenues to their total revenues. 10. OVERRIDE CLAUSE- Some of the preceding rules (#1, #2 & #3) may be ignored only in the event of either a serious (and apparently indefinite) breach of the "personal relationship" between the audio company and reviewer/magazine, and/or the termination, or non-payment, of their advertising contract. |
cpu8088 正式會員115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-08 19:59 | |
|
|
|||
| [#22] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 早十多年前,我投既稿都被這本雜誌刊登過,對器材讚既文句就一字不漏如實刊登,但不足之處就問都無問過我 全部刪除;從此我就再無買過哩本不折不扣既[廣告雜誌]! |
u23dom 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-08 20:04 |
| [#23] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... arthur salvatore is very critical, and he wrote an detailed article analysing the relationships between Advertisement and Hifi magazines. In particular, he criticised Stereophile for increasing the number of good products in their annual reviews after taking ads - oh yes, Stereophile used to be ad-free magazines many years ago, and the annual recommended gears are just a few, and after taking ads, the annual recommendation list have dozens and every piece of gears seem to have merits. Arthur Salvatore suggests that it is due to advertising. It is a very persuasive article using quantitative analysis method. The relationship between ads and reviews of gears ais a very paradoxical one. I think HK mags are the extreme case, which lets ads almost totally taking over critical attitudes. Stereophiles, however, are still informative. It may be less critical, subtle and relative in judging gears, but many reviewers still try to write between the lines and express their critical attitudes about mainstream products (marginal products are ignored - a undeniable fact); sometimes after very wordy reports criticisms are found in the middle or the end of the reviews, with one or two paragraphs. Lastly their archive offers some of the best technical discussions about Hifi gears, and every now and then they still do. Are independent review always the best? Not necessarily, The Audio Critic is an indpendent magazine (http://www.theaudiocritic.com/) Its view of Hifi is however a particular band of 'objectivist' - believing all gears tend to be the same in terms of spec and ignore the fact that some aspects of hifi experience still can't be measured by existing spec. The relationship ad and reviews are an interesting and complex topic! |
zbigniew821 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.39 |
2009-02-08 20:13 |
| [#24] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 我仲有買"物物妓術",不過係為左睇下有物新products.睇下D打開賑J相. 就算呇a講真說話都冇用,D機下下都5皮/10皮以上,我唔信有咁多人個個都比十幾萬買hifi law. D 兩萬以下既products,呇a係唔cover既. |
rickkkk 正式會員 222.xxx.xxx.133 |
2009-02-08 20:20 |
| [#25] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 我仲有買"物物妓術",不過係為左睇下有物新products.睇下D打開賑J相. **************** me too....but now seems no space to store more of this magazine loo, I keep this magazine from 1986...haha |
tckl 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.121 |
2009-02-08 20:28 |
| [#26] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... stereo sound 本書ok架,需然有時呢班日本仔偏向用日本器材,但整体評論算專業,學到野! |
oosh 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.232 |
2009-02-08 20:58 |
| [#27] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... """I keep this magazine from 1986.""" wow is this a joke? bigger joke is that xx technique not even conduct its own testing of frequency response and publish the graphs, and the magazine is titled 'technique" |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-08 21:09 |
| [#28] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 陳煐光係唔係寫開武俠小說! 妢|唔會出本倚天屠尤音響,射雕英雄音響或者如來神掌音響. |
jf90123 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.1 |
2009-02-08 21:28 |
| [#29] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... u tell me he has been around many years perhaps one day he will join r33 to defend his points of view |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-08 22:52 |
| [#30] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... Melody 1688本身開聲已然有世界頂級水準，它靚聲到我不敢有作任何改善它的意圖(更換真空管試聲的工作要留給膽痴們去嘗試了)，但整體而言，我認為Melody 1688已達到最高的調聲水準，摩機友己沒有什麼改良的餘地。 超水準的靚聲前級十年不得一見.....................它聲音回報率之高也是當今其他前級機種難以企及的。 ------------------------------------------------- 唔知糧︰adis JPL同部野即場A/B比較！呀陳生會唔會為坌J謊言而汗顏呢？ |
路人茂 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.231 |
2009-02-08 22:59 |
| [#31] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 的寫膳槁要人信服是要在一百句實話中加一句善意大話先有人信服！你睇下the absoulte sound 同架仔的stero sound人地膳左咁多年都............. |
路人茂 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.231 |
2009-02-08 23:04 |
| [#32] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 唔知糧︰adis JPL同部野即場A/B比較！呀陳生會唔會為坌J謊言而汗顏呢？ 唔使用Jadis JPL金晒嗎?? 用部舊ARC 都除時KO. 用過部SP3MK2 真正比坒漲. |
fatchoy 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.105 |
2009-02-08 23:04 |
| [#33] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... i can reply for mr chan jadis represents european sound, melody is china sounding. incomparable. or pre amp needs to match with power amp. if matched properly you wont believe how good the sounding is or you need to select proper interconnect cables, power cables to bring up good sound or your ears have problems. mine is golden |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-08 23:22 |
| [#34] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 永遠向前，永不停步，永遠有好野， |
山人 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.85 |
2009-02-08 23:44 |
| [#35] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... i can reply for mr chan jadis represents european sound, melody is china sounding. incomparable. or pre amp needs to match with power amp. if matched properly you wont believe how good the sounding is or you need to select proper interconnect cables, power cables to bring up good sound or your ears have problems. mine is golden ------------------------------------------------- 哈哈，兄台既答案真是可圈可點！ 不過我可以好肯定咁講，任呀陳生搵配搭，JPL都一樣好輕鬆咁贏。 至於坅YGolden Ear.............哈哈哈，我諗呢度除左呀茂呢個廢柴外，大把白金耳啦 |
路人茂 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.231 |
2009-02-08 23:55 |
| [#36] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... how much is jpl? and how much is melody? incomparable mr chan should put in a proviso claiming that melody is the best within its price range. as he did not do so just open up lots of attacks. he will learn next time but whether you can teach an old dog new tricks is questionable lol |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-09 00:12 |
| [#37] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 0尼本0野所講0既同我所聽到0既有好大差異, 正所謂道不同,不相為謀..冇睇好耐都慳番0吾少 (:P |
三淺一深 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.218 |
2009-02-09 01:51 |
| [#38] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... """哈哈哈，我諗呢度除左呀茂呢個廢柴外，大把白金耳啦""" i will believe you if you are a medical doctor and done hearing check ups for them. there are lots they think they can hear but actually out from their imagination :-) |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-02-09 01:52 |
| [#39] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... Melody 1688本身開聲已然有世界頂級水準， 應該馬上定高國寶級, 為國爭光. 外國做到的, 我們做得更好, 超英趕美. 只在小雜誌亂吹. 太浪費. 應上報中聯辦, 國務院跟進. 飛起特區政府. 歷史第一部有世界頂級水準的音. 祖國加油. |
GRF 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.101 |
2009-02-09 16:21 |
| [#40] 好誇張評論........有史以來最好聲... 以我聽盡天下靚聲前級作準，這是一部可以「聽過世」的膽機傑作。 部部机聽過世, ＋世部聽唔完, 一屋都係. 對上一百部聽過世的前後係點處理. 外國品牌唔洗做. 執左妧. 咁猛競爭對手. 但好似二手2-3 千港紙????? |
GRF 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.101 |
2009-02-09 16:58 |
