兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#32] 屏風喇叭同好會 HelloMorning 兄, 小弟的Maggie 1.6QR 用 DIY Pass Zen V5 推之十分有音樂味. 用 PassLab X150 推亦交足貨. 也很想試試用e機推推. 請問有什麼款式可以介紹一鴭O? 謝謝 |
Vash 正式會員219.xxx.xxx.156 |
2007-04-28 16:22 | |
|
|
|||
| [#33] 屏風喇叭同好會 Size is not an issue. In fact, small size is an advantage for a panel speaker because it is a coherent desig ------------------------------------------ Kenny......Can not agree with you 100%. I have owned Dayton Wright, Double Quad, Quad 57, Quad 63, Accustate before. All of them (except the Quad ESL57) need bigger room in order to get the best performance out of them. The Quad ESL57 sound beautiful in a small room. I have also listened to my friend's Martin Logan, Apogee and Maggies. None of them is my cup of tea. Tonal quality is far cry from Quad ESL57. Of course, it's all depending on your music preference. If you like dynamic effect and like to play very loud, then ESL57 will not fit you. However, if you like human voice, violin, jazz, chember music etc. you will feel like you have found heaven on earth. |
PCS100 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.235 |
2007-04-28 16:36 |
| [#34] 屏風喇叭同好會 PCS100, all speakers, box, horn, planar alike, they need space to breathe no question. Planar may need more space, especially to have reasonable performance, but they are not more demanding than a box speaker, or a horn. But the advantages of a planar speaker are : true life form image with full height, super quick sound with no stress, and no distortion sound, something horn and box cannot beat. Nevertheless, planar speakers would not have ground shaking bass impact. Well -- no resume la -- I have been very fortunate that I have owned some planar speakers (5) too and listened to a lot more so I believe I know a little bit. I enjoyed everyone of them. I am just a typical planar person. |
Kenny 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.146 |
2007-04-28 17:05 |
| [#35] 屏風喇叭同好會 Vash 兄: 我說"Maggie勿配石機,小心小心", 系針對nicknick而言(他說他未玩過屏風), 怕他爆機爆到跌ohm, 玩出直流電來. 閣下識DIY, 這些對你當然不是問題. 我不是說膽機推屏風一定好過石機, 勿誤會.(雖然我多數選膽機,hehe....) 相信樓下Gingers求其拿一部珍藏LEAK推Maggie都會很正. 我聽過最深刻印象的Maggie是用Radford推:(希望link到相)  |
HelloMorning 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.35 |
2007-04-28 17:27 |
| [#36] 屏風喇叭同好會 ＞＞ 人一世物一世, 號角/動圈/屏風三大類, 點都要玩下. hehe, that's exactly why I'm itchy la. |
nicknick 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.71 |
2007-04-28 17:33 |
| [#37] 屏風喇叭同好會 i USE NUFORCE PRE + HALFER POWER P |
Jensenspeaker 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.29 |
2007-04-28 20:07 |
| [#38] 屏風喇叭同好會 HI, nicknick I think so, K&S should be King Sound? Anyone actual heard the speaker, The technology is from USA I think? |
hm7734 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.114 |
2007-04-29 01:55 |
| [#39] 屏風喇叭同好會 Strange to see the chopsticks were used in the speakers. Photo reposted from Fever Circle :-)  |
Gingers 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.111 |
2007-04-29 08:26 |
| [#40] 屏風喇叭同好會 Is CHOPSTICK a patent medicine for Magneplanar??  |
Gingers 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.111 |
2007-04-29 08:35 |
| [#41] 屏風喇叭同好會 Apogee .JPG?dc=4675620743571966835) |
rcwy 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.253 |
2007-05-01 00:52 |
| [#42] 屏風喇叭同好會 hi rcwy i will back to Hk one week form wales may i visit you kowloon bay showroom , i want to listen tannoy 15gold , would you please leave you phone no to my Emai to arrange the time: george_wong0511@hotmail.com george |
vtm211 正式會員 91.xxx.xxx.26 |
2007-05-01 06:54 |
| [#43] 屏風喇叭同好會 George, Got your message. Check for my reply! :) |
rcwy 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.253 |
2007-05-03 09:08 |
| [#44] 屏風喇叭同好會 Hi ModernClassic, must be very different to change from Apogee ribbons to vintage dynamic speaker. It is very difficult at first, can't forget the total coherent sound field generated, ( surround sound with only a pair of panels , not possible with boxed speakers ) smooth treble presentation, unlike others that treble is being squeezed and jetted out! etc etc. But then soon I started to appreciate vintage speakers of their life-like mid and smooth high, when used with low powered vintage amplications. |
ModernClassic 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.245 |
2007-05-03 12:07 |
| [#45] 屏風喇叭同好會 mmmm, interesting path to audio heaven. I'm still stuck in the direct radiating driver stage, hope to graduate to 屏風 soon. |
nicknick 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.126 |
2007-05-04 17:31 |
| [#46] 屏風喇叭同好會 Hello Maggie users out there, Wondering if a 60W per channel tube amp can do the justice for maggie 1.6, say in a 200ft room. And whether it is necessary for the tube amp to feature 4 ohm tap for matching speaker impedance load?? What about tube preference? 6550 preferred over EL34?? Thanks. |
jules 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.108 |
2007-10-17 06:40 |
| [#47] 屏風喇叭同好會 Morning jules, 60W tube amp is ample power for the Maggie 1.6. Although the speaker claims an impedance of 4 ohm load, I have found the 8 ohm tap gives the best power-efficiency ratio, and the best sound to boot. 6550 tubes seem to be more desirable as Maggies do require a lot of muscle to make her sing. |
limage 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.18 |
2007-10-17 07:47 |
| [#48] 屏風喇叭同好會 Many thanks for advice. |
jules 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.111 |
2007-10-18 06:06 |
| [#49] 屏風喇叭同好會 It must be a good tube amp. When I heard the Maggie from Excel, the best is from Master Yu' Graff tube amp. Far far better than his Krell huge amp even in bass... no idea why. Otherwise, you must require a solid amp that handles low impedance at ease to have good performance. |
Kenny 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.131 |
2007-10-18 07:41 |
| [#50] 屏風喇叭同好會 Otherwise, you must require a solid amp that handles low impedance at ease to have good performance ________________________________ Kenny, Despite their apparently low impedance of 4 ohms, the Maggies feature a purely resistive load that is ruler straight. In other words, they are not difficult to drive as long as sufficient power is available. Yes, the Maggies are insatiable and they can take an awesome amount of power with ease. I have tried different amps with the Maggies, powerplants like Rowland 7, Marantz 500, Phase Linear 400 and 700, EAR549, and now CJ Premier One. They all seem to be doing the job pretty well. Krell is, perhaps, the rare exception. |
limage 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.60 |
2007-10-18 09:13 |
| [#51] 屏風喇叭同好會 Morning gentlemen. I think Krell isn't that bad, being designed to handle speakers with fluctuating impendance, when they hit purely resistive loads, their edge is gone. Especially when you compared it with a well engineered OTL tube amp on the Maggie, issues like refinement, transparency & speed arise. |
Derek2A3 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.81 |
2007-10-18 09:50 |
