兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 各位AV界師兄，請就上述三款AV收音擴音機，給予寶貴意見，例如那一款聲音、畫面質素較佳，操作容易，性能價值比例最高，承蒙賜教，不勝感激！ |
LUWA 正式會員219.xxx.xxx.13 |
2009-11-16 15:59 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 性能價值比例最高MUST [5007] sure! |
avlam 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.77 |
2009-11-16 18:41 |
| [#3] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 5007 同之前 906 性能差幾多呢? |
XPR 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.206 |
2009-11-16 20:46 |
| [#4] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC please elaborate why 5007? I vote for poineer 82 |
hifi33 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.84 |
2009-11-16 21:00 |
| [#5] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC 5007已唔係9系既ONKYO聲啦~!威猛得多~!不過唔好唸到強到DENON咁~! 講操作DENON個介面WIN曬~! |
siuwing 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.88 |
2009-11-16 23:37 |
| [#6] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC 邊部好就唔知(其實我三部都無試過)，不過其實LX-82個video upscale同Lx-81係一樣(我用左81成年)，畫方面如果你要靠佢upscale就可以唔使理，佢只有最基本的"發爛渣"，如果HDMI入480P或720P仲唔會upscale添，只有analog入先會upscale，呢方面天龍同安橋先進好多 不過，聲方面真係無墅講，快、清、爽、準，定位一流，睇D多對白o既戲真頭覺得自已D英文都好左咁誇張，比起好多其他AV amp出聲的毛燥感乾淨好多，但有人又會話好人工化，但係我又覺得無問題 當然，講到天花龍鳳都無用，自已感受下最好 |
forestpig 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-11-17 10:44 |
| [#7] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC Why nobody give any comments on Denon AVR-4810? |
LUWA 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.13 |
2009-11-18 15:41 |
| [#8] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC because you say [性能價值比例最高] denon is good for movie & tv game! |
avlam 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.244 |
2009-11-18 23:09 |
| [#9] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC Hi! avlam and other borthers, thank you very much for your comments. Recently, another brother told me that the Onkyo TX-NR5007 other than having the highest Performance-Price Ratio, when listening normal stero music, it will give the best sound than Denon & Pioneer. If this true, I will go ahead to buy TX-NR5007, if no further comments received from other AV playing senior brothers. |
LUWA 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.13 |
2009-11-19 15:29 |
| [#10] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC What is the cheapest price of 4810 now? |
bs 正式會員 123.xxx.xxx.212 |
2009-11-28 01:08 |
| [#11] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC i will vote for pioneer as well, i m onkyo 905 and yamaha 3800 user before .i have friends who own 4308 and pioneer 81 , onkyo sounds hard, its good for movie but for music will be too hard . onkyo dynamic range not enough compare to denon and pioneer . pionner detail sure win the other 2 band .onkyo sound wall simple ,no space feel at all(may be some people like simple) ,denon surround better than onkyo but pioneer the best .denon everything fine but detail really no good comapre to 81 . just giving my own experience , don't beat my head, i bought 905 because i saw the post in review 33 said its good but...... thats why i wanna share this , hope you guys don't need waste money like me . 最後修改時間: 2009-11-28 19:18:26 |
siumin 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.27 |
2009-11-28 18:57 |
| [#12] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 除了以上三部,我仲考慮緊Yamaha Z 7,各有各好,不知如何入手。我好想試下front height...... |
roy97 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.220 |
2010-01-22 15:34 |
| [#13] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 But Z7 and LX82 are only 7.1. I suspect the successor of LX-82 will be at least 9.1. Then the second hand price of all LX82 will drop drop drop... |
elvisandbilly 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.104 |
2010-01-22 16:15 |
| [#14] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 我試front height之後很難忘,好正!有人說在前置喇叭上再加1對喇叭很難，但我認為不難。我相信明年yamaha,pioneer的新機必定有9.1,這是大勢所趨。 最後修改時間: 2010-01-22 16:53:02 |
roy97 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.220 |
2010-01-22 16:51 |
| [#15] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC I would choose onkyo. Balanced for both music and movie. All u get from denon is fast and loudness. The sound is harsh amd lack of details. Pioneer is clean and fast. This is the advantage I of icepower. But if u use it for music, no spirit at all. |
cocacola99 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.81 |
2010-01-23 22:09 |
| [#16] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 I will vote to Denon, from the beginning when i was snall , i have heard the powerful from denon. I am also using Denon4308a, it was so powerful and strength. Overall everythings come good from Japan |
warmmjs 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.243 |
2010-03-13 10:47 |
| [#17] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 樓主試晒咁多部未 ?? |
kinglcm 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.112 |
2010-03-13 23:44 |
| [#18] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 在定位上同埋價錢方面,SC-LX82喺香港個定價超抵, 喺日本LX-82係屬￥300,000以上級別嘅產品,僅次於旗艦. 聲音方面你可說介乎Yamaha 與 Denon之間,有貼近Y記的分析力和細節,但比Y記更大力水,動態更強! 調轉講都得，無Y記個包圍感和細節咁强,又唔夠Denon咁好力水,拳拳到肉.但聲效方面,始終係個人喜好和配搭問題，去阿X或英X試下啦 ! Declare: 我由用左多年Y記，忍痛轉左去LX-82 ! |
Ming Sir 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.243 |
2010-05-10 08:46 |
| [#19] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 One of the reason I gave-up Yamaha is, it don't have 9.1 anymore (except Z11, which is out of my budget), it makes be puzzle, cos in the past, no matter AZ-1 or 2600 or even the old 2070(I owned these before) can have 9.1/8.1(7.1/6.1 + Front effect/presence), how come it is exclusively for Z11 only now ???? Z7 is not bad, except no 7.1(choose between Presence or Rear back, can't both), and is a ＞ 2 years old model ! 最後修改時間: 2010-05-10 08:54:41 |
Ming Sir 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.243 |
2010-05-10 08:53 |
| [#20] Denon AVR-4810, Onkyo TX-NR5007, Pioneer SC-LX82 Luwa兄，你好。 結果有沒有買得成Onkyo TX-NR5007呀？個人覺得效果如何？ |
donaldma 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.149 |
2010-06-06 23:05 |
