兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期 |
[#1] 中了jamo毒 ?? 今日到旺角行hifi鋪,行到一間鋪頭,係試音室放了一對書架,傍邊放了對類似大屏風的喇叭.當我正在參觀時,發覺正在播放的聲音好舒服,好自然立體,而且人聲高度好好.初初以為係對書架開聲,點知原來係對大屏風喇叭開聲~望下望下牌子~竟然係jamo~我仲以為jamo淨係出AV喇叭~估唔到jamo都有出貴價喇叭~而且聲音比好多同價位喇叭仲要好.聽完之後返屋企聽自己個對,即刻有點失落,點解自己個對比佢貴都做唔到個種離箱感~自然感~因為佢係無箱屏風設計??定係單元多??(兩個12吋加子彈中音高音).可惜我屋企地方細,如果夠一定要換對jamo試下.我想問下各位師兄~有無其它size比較細~類似jamo個種屏風設計的喇叭介紹下??我聽個對jamo係R907,資料如下,巳經係同係列內最細:http://www.jamospeakers.com/eu-en/products/r-907-description/ 等我可以搵對細屏風解下毒~因中毒太深. |
BB.G 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.72 |
2009-10-08 22:54 | |
|
[#2] 中了jamo毒 ?? jamo淨係出AV喇叭? 請問何為AV喇叭?有何特徵? |
tinlung2068 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.162 |
2009-10-09 07:59 |
[#3] 中了jamo毒 ?? 這個屬於無箱障板喇叭,未算係正式既屏風設計。 不過要玩得好就要和屏風一樣投放資源於空間、擺位上。 註:小弟是其中一個屏風用家 |
Vash 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.193 |
2009-10-09 08:18 |
[#4] 中了jamo毒 ?? 想問 r907 多少錢 一對? |
springroll 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.38 |
2009-10-09 09:35 |
[#5] 中了jamo毒 ?? about USD10,000 per pair review: http://stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/jamo_reference_r_907_loudspeaker/ |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-10-09 11:07 |
[#6] 中了jamo毒 ?? It costs about $50k in Hong Kong. I almost bought it a couple of months ago. Due to its design and the way it delivers sound, I think it can provide sound quality quite a bit better than equivalent priced speakers, and unlike "real" panels, it actually has big and tight bass for such a "small" panel. I particularly like its transparency and naturalness (sounds like real human/instruments moving air) Maybe because there are less things to build (no box), the build quality is actually quite outstanding for the price. I ultimately did not buy them because even the "small" R907 would be a little too wide for my room. |
accudude 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.158 |
2009-10-09 11:57 |
[#7] 中了jamo毒 ?? >>>>>>>It costs about $50k in Hong Kong. Quite attractive! Will have a audition later. Thx! |
springroll 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.38 |
2009-10-09 12:13 |
[#8] 中了jamo毒 ?? Thanks BB.G san for information. i may have a audition later too. Where the shop? |
1398 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.81 |
2009-10-09 12:35 |
[#9] 中了jamo毒 ?? 系咪在中僑17楼?上次聽過真系幾正,價錢仲幾好。 佬板話會遲啲做幾埸聆聽會,招待發燒友。 最後修改時間: 2009-10-09 13:14:22 |
dcman 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.238 |
2009-10-09 13:10 |
[#10] 中了jamo毒 ?? 剛剛食Lunch走去聽過,應該係中僑16樓(角位),對喇叭D 聲都幾自然開揚,低音潛得好深,聽過之後我都跌眼鏡。我見佢有好多線賣,佢又肯試,於是幫佢買條喇叭線番去,今晚放工返去又有得玩。 |
hcl 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.221 |
2009-10-09 16:36 |
[#11] 中了jamo毒 ?? 2x12 inch bass units how big is the demo room? over 250 sq ft? |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-10-09 16:47 |
[#12] 中了jamo毒 ?? >>2x12 inch bass units According to what I have read about these speakers, they intentionally needed big woofers to generate enough output to overcome cancellation of bass as the back wave mixes with the front. The resulting effect (as I have heard in person) is rather deep bass but not nearly as big as the four big 12 inchers would suggest (a la JBL, etc.) |
accudude 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.158 |
2009-10-09 18:20 |
[#13] 中了jamo毒 ?? may be the jamo bass is right while jbl 4x 12 inch is exaggerated :-) speaker placement and room size will have big effect on bass reproduction |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-10-09 19:40 |
[#14] 中了jamo毒 ?? 我剛才同幾位老友(都係發燒友)食飯.我將昨日無心之下的試音經歷話比佢地聽,佢地聽完之後都好大反應~話jamo喇叭竟然可以令到我有想換喇叭衝動??因為佢地知道我對喇叭都玩了四年,當佢老婆一樣~都可以比人ko???而且我對喇叭成九皮野都會輸???有冇搞錯!!!我同佢地講,昨日回家巳經第一時間再聽自己套組合.細心比較之下~雖然低音部份衝激力比較強同埋身,但係就欠缺jamo個種從容不迫同埋比到你量感之餘又自然的低音.而音場方面大家都好離箱~但係深度方面就差好遠.大家都係放在離後牆三呎左右,我個對就一味得個闊,佢個對一開聲無論深度同闊度都有~仲係由大至細~由近至遠個種!!唯一係人聲打個和,各有特色,搞到我聽了幾首歌之後無晒心機.我幾個朋友聽完我講之後,都話既然鐘意就換喇叭~有成二百呎廳玩駛乜驚~其它細size屏風未必做到個種效果~而且仲難推.但係我就好驚唔夠地方玩~因為昨日的試音室有成三百呎.幾條傻佬就係以上的話題吹了幾粒鐘,搞到我而家心大心細~去唔去馬好??? |
BB.G 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.72 |
2009-10-09 23:20 |
[#15] 中了jamo毒 ?? bb.g no prob. just pay another visit and bring along your favourite cds and have another audition. notice what amp and source electronics used. then have another cooling period before u make decision. your friends ears and music taste may not be used as yardstick. |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2009-10-09 23:44 |
[#16] 中了jamo毒 ?? Hi BB.G, If you find the mid-range (and treble) of the 907 not as good as the rest of the spectrum, perhaps you should go for the R909. R909 features Scanspeak Revelator tweeters and a nicer midrange driver, on top of two 15 inch woofers. However, you would need the room to accomodate it (though strictly speaking, it is not that much bigger than the huge 907, maybe 2 inches bigger in all dimensions). Price, I think, is about 15k higher. |
accudude 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.158 |
2009-10-13 11:35 |
[#17] 中了jamo毒 ?? "15k higher", US or HKD? |
CKL2 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.171 |
2009-10-13 11:50 |
[#18] 中了jamo毒 ?? BB. where can find this to listern up ? around how much... It's design is very good which can deliver very good and deep image. |
jbl-175 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.150 |
2009-10-13 12:40 |
[#19] 中了jamo毒 ?? >>"15k higher", US or HKD? >> HK$ |
accudude 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.158 |
2009-10-13 14:58 |
[#20] 中了jamo毒 ?? accudude兄~多謝你的寶貴意見.近日比較忙~我有時間都會帶些自己聽開的cd去聽多次907.或者亦會去比較一下同909的分別.不過我有一個想法,因907係雙12吋低音,而909係雙15吋低音~理論上907的低頻迅變會比909快(單元面積阻力問題).我現用的後級係passlab x150 每邊150w~推907,正常應該剛剛好,如果推909雙15吋可能唔夠力. 而且我當日在試音室聽的後級都係每邊150wmodwright(型號不記得)都推得幾好. 我不想換喇叭之後又話唔夠力要換機(換完喇叭又話換機會比老婆插死!!!) 而且我得18呎x11呎廳,所以907係我首選. 另外jbl-175兄~我在旺角中橋大廈16樓試聽的,價錢$53800~未問實價錢,買時先問佢實價. |
BB.G 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.72 |
2009-10-14 00:03 |