影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞  下頁  尾頁 寄件者 傳送日期 由舊至新 由新至舊
[#1] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
Revox B225 vs Revox B226s 邊部CD機好聲D

最後修改時間: 2011-05-05 11:10:34
wongkim
個人訊息 會員
203.xxx.xxx.42
2011-05-05 11:02
[#2] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
我曾慕名買入Revox B225, 厚朦老聲,高段"著草".
不敵我另一部cd850mk1
k.c
個人訊息 會員
119.xxx.xxx.254
2011-05-05 15:02
[#3] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
你部B225不在 狀態,當然朦啦。

如果正常狀態十分好聲。

最後修改時間: 2011-05-05 15:42:50
wongkim
個人訊息 會員
203.xxx.xxx.14
2011-05-05 15:41
[#4] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
b225- typical sound,
b226s - details but lack of warmth and so called 'FEELING"
The result is B225 wins.
ptp
個人訊息 會員
202.xxx.xxx.140
2011-05-05 16:10
[#5] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
可能我部B225真係不在狀態, 來一場盲聽比較會中肯d.
k.c
個人訊息 會員
119.xxx.xxx.254
2011-05-05 16:18
[#6] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
B225 should be better than 850MK1 or 850MKII, I used all before and now keep B225.
dy111
個人訊息 會員
218.xxx.xxx.142
2011-05-05 16:26
[#7] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
why not choose Studer A727 ? you will get more surprise !
sunny
個人訊息 會員
61.xxx.xxx.120
2011-05-05 16:56
[#8] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
我曾慕名買入Revox B225, 厚朦老聲,高段"著草".
不敵我另一部cd850mk1

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Have you try to use different power cord? It will made you surprise !

B225 should be better than 850MK1 or 850MKII, agreed x2
bbqchipshk
個人訊息 會員
63.xxx.xxx.51
2011-05-05 19:14
[#9] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
兩部都玩過,B225聽人聲 is good,聽classic B226 is prefect!
But I don't think they are 朦聲! It is 老聲!
Try to use different power cord to 教聲
ckh035
個人訊息 會員
182.xxx.xxx.29
2011-05-05 19:45
[#10] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
B225 should be better than 850MK1 or 850MKII, agreed x10000000

B225 vs 850 MKI/II ----- 冇得比

B225 vs B226S ----- B225 味道係 ok正, B226S是 B226系內最出色的巔峯之作,無論在幼滑度、分析力、細緻度、音場、音樂味、高低延伸、都遠在 B225 之上,只有人聲的濃度,是 B225的強項,同系機14 bit VS 16 bit,連爭論都不需要。

有傳,725才是極品,聽吓就算!

但說 B225朦聲,check 吓套機好啦!

我用過不少 Revox器材,我都仲有佢 70年代嘅機種,朦聲?未試過!



最後修改時間: 2011-05-05 21:03:34
唐吉訶德
個人訊息 正式會員
112.xxx.xxx.215
2011-05-05 21:02
[#11] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
Studer 727 好聲但是 Studer A730
wongkim
個人訊息 會員
221.xxx.xxx.215
2011-05-05 22:00
[#12] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
b225- typical sound,
b226s - details but lack of warmth and so called 'FEELING"
The result is B225 wins.

-------------

B226S是 B226系內最出色的巔峯之作,無論在幼滑度、分析力、細緻度、音場、音樂味、高低延伸、都遠在 B225 之上,只有人聲的濃度,是 B225的強項,同系機14 bit VS 16 bit,連爭論都不需要。
_________________________

可能配搭唔同致出現唔同評價.
但我傾向後者,因聽過b226s後,逐在ebay買入b225,但失望.

其實好或唔好都無所謂, 機又唔係我做.
認真既也可來一場"盲聽"比較,好過口舌分高下.
如證明你地玩得好,我也從中學到野.
k.c
個人訊息 會員
119.xxx.xxx.254
2011-05-05 22:20
[#13] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
講到比較,明顯靜晒.唔通言語溝通有問題?
我玩hifi咁耐都係咁玩,既然無回應就作罷.
k.c
個人訊息 會員
119.xxx.xxx.254
2011-05-06 14:10
[#14] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
It is more appropriate to say which kind of sound character you like more instead of which is better. It is very difficult to say how the Philips chipset engineer decide what objective they have in mind to produce such design in both analog and digital. Surely there were marketing influence behind.

Technically the analog stage of Revox B225 and B226S were aimed for different generation music trend as well as gear matching purpose. Philips 850 CD was almost the last audiophile CDP by the company. Judging from the selling price now and then; Revox is almost 2 time higher than 850MKII
just to reflect the build quality and market segment in real world.

For my personal choice; I would recommend B226S instead of the other 2 for a few reasons:

a)it used CDM4 which is easier for future maintenance.
b)it has digital output for connection to dac.
c) the S series employed best components from Revox engineers for critical music reproduction; particular the power transformer it used.
d)it can take remote control.
e)the stylish faceplate.
f)very good resell value and a seek-after item for many experienced audiophiles.

Lets get back to music and enjoy.



最後修改時間: 2011-05-06 15:35:47
com-buddy
個人訊息 會員
1.xxx.xxx.208
2011-05-06 15:32
[#15] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
cd880,cdm1頭,用原裝電源線
cd850,cdm4頭.電源線用大陸平線diy.
衹玩頭,兩部機都加同一解碼,用同一係統.

估下邊部靚?
k.c
個人訊息 會員
119.xxx.xxx.254
2011-05-07 00:42
[#16] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    


最後修改時間: 2011-05-07 10:40:56
jcml
個人訊息 正式會員
203.xxx.xxx.188
2011-05-07 10:32
[#17] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
兩部都重,但880稍重.840就輕.

經過來回測試,cdm1讓唔起cdm4一條幾舊水既土炮電線
k.c
個人訊息 會員
119.xxx.xxx.254
2011-05-07 10:46
[#18] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
http://www.dutchaudioclassics.nl/philips_cd850_cdplayer/

http://www.dutchaudioclassics.nl/philips_cd880_cdplayer/

jcml
個人訊息 正式會員
203.xxx.xxx.188
2011-05-07 11:02
[#19] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
玩線好過玩機啦
wongkim
個人訊息 會員
203.xxx.xxx.2
2011-05-07 15:02
[#20] Revox B225 vs Revox B226s    
玩線好過玩機啦
wongkim
個人訊息 會員
203.xxx.xxx.2
2011-05-07 15:06
主旨內容一共有 2 頁,每頁顯示 20 個信息,選擇頁數:  下頁  尾頁
按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新由舊至新  由新至舊由新至舊
最新資訊 - 影音
數碼+模擬+耳機放大,BURSON AUDIO 推出多功能小型合併式放大 Timekeeper 3 2021-05-13

最新資訊 - 影音
向左轉向右轉,Sanwa Supply 推出全新 AD-HD21LY 系列 L 型 HDMI 接駁器 2021-05-12

最新資訊 - 影音
Inakustik AC-1204 AIR MKII 電源線 2021-05-12

最新資訊 - 影音
音色細緻入微 Sennheiser 全新 IE 900 旗艦發燒級耳機 2021-05-12