兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRATED ? Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRATED ? Can any high hands explain the technical reasons why ? |
h2005 正式會員220.xxx.xxx.169 |
2008-12-20 01:32 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRATED ? what makes you think a well designed integrated amp cannot be better than crappy pre + power amps? |
cpu8088 正式會員 220.xxx.xxx.171 |
2008-12-20 04:26 |
| [#3] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT "what makes you think a well designed integrated amp cannot be better than crappy pre + power amps?" cpu bro, it was a question,not a statement. I believe the answer is highly possible that it can better either way. That's why I open this thread to discuss it since I am not a very experienced user in PRE/POWER setup. Can any PRE/POWER share your thoughts and experience ? |
h2005 正式會員 220.xxx.xxx.221 |
2008-12-20 13:12 |
| [#4] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT your opinion already formed with a view that separates are better than integrated amps, and you request an answer as to your "why". you should ask why the "differences" instead of "better" |
cpu8088 正式會員 220.xxx.xxx.229 |
2008-12-20 13:38 |
| [#5] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT 僮虒靮e後級一定堅過合併 七萬元一部合併同 七萬元一套前後級 我話合併贏多 |
thomascook 正式會員 59.xxx.xxx.40 |
2008-12-20 14:01 |
| [#6] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT an advantage of having pre power is minimizing the effects of electro magnetic influences generate by power amp affecting the weaker signals of pre amp. but then with pre power you have to spend money on interconnect cables |
cpu8088 正式會員 220.xxx.xxx.229 |
2008-12-20 22:58 |
| [#7] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT #5 Right |
aheung 會員 219.xxx.xxx.132 |
2019-06-07 09:09 |
| [#8] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT #5 現在7萬一部合併機 拆開兩部前後級賣 應該會賣 7萬+7萬 |
tonywong 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.15 |
2019-06-07 10:25 |
| [#9] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT 就等於問一個三項鐵人做出嘅時間， 同3個人分開玩跑步、游水、踩單車嘅時間，邊個會贏? |
bigleung 正式會員 223.xxx.xxx.44 |
2019-06-07 11:59 |
| [#10] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRAT Because this favours company to make more money. Technically, shortest path is always the best. No worry about Isolation as it can be solved by simple solution. |
panda000 會員 124.xxx.xxx.131 |
2019-06-08 12:23 |
| [#11] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRATED ? 好少合併前膽後石，有都好貴。 |
lmceric84 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.166 |
2019-06-08 13:10 |
| [#12] Why PRE-AMP+ POWER IS BETTER THAN INTERGRATED ? #11 呢三日展場有，唔好聲平嘢。 最後修改時間: 2019-06-08 13:21:13 |
Krell 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.210 |
2019-06-08 13:20 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
