兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#41] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 整多部M-2000 定格連続平均出力（20Hz～20kHz間） 1Ω負荷：2000W（音楽信号に限る） 2Ω負荷：1000W 4Ω負荷：500W 8Ω負荷：250W 注意是20hz-20Khz的Power.  |
navyseals 正式會員218.xxx.xxx.88 |
2009-05-06 14:11 | |
|
|
|||
| [#42] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? Accuphase M-1000 8Ω 1000W  |
AMDOpteron250 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.40 |
2009-05-06 14:19 |
| [#43] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 少年時聽過這對A-100，才明白"力" 的意思! ------------------------------------------ 搞錯晒，是M100 1000W（2Ω） 800W（4Ω） 500W（8Ω） 250W（16Ω）  |
navyseals 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.88 |
2009-05-06 14:19 |
| [#44] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 老實講以NAD這樣–個冇廠只有設計的公司來說，以价論貨確唔差！但我寧取山靈，大家都係大陸做！講力，講今析、音樂感、价錢都在nad之上。 Mr. Oldman 話玩音响係講'just spending money expect max performance within a buget !'....咁山靈係絕對優於NAD.....但......... 各人有各人口味，呀茂除考慮音質之餘亦會考慮該廠對音樂之熱誠及執著！如舊Mark 及舊Krell，當閣下折開部机一看零部件的排列及素質你會從心中讚出來！ 如金仔，見到他們的工程師用盡方法去減少干擾！排列工整，真係作 |
路人茂 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.60 |
2009-05-06 15:21 |
| [#45] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 個人經驗, 大陸牌子d機唔襟用, 我用過山靈、原創、羽商等牌子, 全部兩年內壞機. |
no.33 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.221 |
2009-05-06 15:51 |
| [#46] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? the ability of accuphase amp doubling the power when loading impedance lower down half is higher than other brands because they use massive heatsink |
batmanames04 正式會員 117.xxx.xxx.35 |
2009-05-06 15:54 |
| [#47] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 個人經驗, 大陸牌子d機唔襟用, 我用過山靈、原創、羽商等牌子, 全部兩年內壞機. ------------------------------------- 呢個就係国產同外地生產的分別，需知同一數值的零部件價格有一倍以上的差別！國產多用平價零部件！ |
路人茂 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.60 |
2009-05-06 16:17 |
| [#48] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 肉眼睇d零件唔差, 有兩部係燒牛...... |
no.33 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.221 |
2009-05-06 16:29 |
| [#49] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 一部机好與坏变壓器佔大部份比重 |
路人茂 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.60 |
2009-05-06 16:43 |
| [#50] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 咁山靈仲可唔可取呢..... |
no.33 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.221 |
2009-05-06 16:46 |
| [#51] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 在目前的情形下：呀茂絕對不會購買國產的音响產品，包括oem牌子在內！因大部份生產商皆是唯利是圖冇左一份對音响的熱誠及執著。這就是為興趣而工作及為生活而工作的分別 |
路人茂 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.60 |
2009-05-06 16:48 |
| [#52] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 咁山靈仲可唔可取呢..... ----------------------- 你一定要呀茂在nad同山靈中挑，呀茂一定要山靈！ |
路人茂 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.60 |
2009-05-06 16:51 |
| [#53] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? I used to have M8000 mono block. 250W per channel. It sounds less powerful that the ML335 that it replaces. But it can control a B&W 803 effortlessly, while ML335 could not control its treble that it sounds very sharp and the overall sound is disintegrated. You can buy a professional amplifier that is small package but outputs 1000W per channel. It sounds powerful too. You can buy a truck with 1000 horsepower. You can buy a Ferrari with 250 horsepower. Apple is not an orange. Not to mention that Accuphase sounds much much better than a Mark Levinson. |
Kenny 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.172 |
2009-05-06 20:34 |
| [#54] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 有時足料未必等於有力水，Accuphase amp正是一個好例子。 |
nea 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.96 |
2009-05-06 21:17 |
| [#55] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 力的表現每個厰都唔同！正如呀茂所說：金嗓子是斯文而柔靭！想有質素而又有气吞天下的感覺？用Krell啦 |
路人茂 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.213 |
2009-05-06 21:37 |
| [#56] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? I have also owned a Krell. It is nowhere near a performance of an Accuphase amplifier. Of course, this is a $$ to $$ comparison that equally price matched gears would be compared. It is very easy to design a gear that has the perfect paper spec. How it performs is totally another matter. |
Kenny 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.172 |
2009-05-06 22:08 |
| [#57] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? So, by your opinion which one is better? |
Jameskyc 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.89 |
2009-05-07 20:24 |
| [#58] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? 我用緊Ｅ４５０都非常好力 除非閣下聆聽環境有成五佰呎以上喇 如果唔係點會唔夠力 又或者閣下對力嘅有所不同 咁不如加個超底音喇？ |
PLAY1422 正式會員 119.xxx.xxx.254 |
2009-05-08 00:07 |
| [#59] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? Just passby.......the true purpose of Sub-woofer is to increase the impact and authority of the lower octave. If ones find the bass impact and bass slam(actually mid bass) is not adequate, he/she should consider to change the speaker or amplifier in whole, adding a sub-woofer and using it with high crossover point with the main speaker just creating a peak at the mid-bass frequency....... |
foxtan 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.182 |
2009-05-08 00:22 |
| [#60] 點解Accuphase amp 無一般牌子 output power 咁大? Kindergarden talk! This is like arguing on should balance sound better than RCA. Go for a Poineer or Sony mini set which can easily give you 400 or 500 Watts at a few thousand dollar. |
123 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.89 |
2009-05-10 01:28 |
