| 汽車主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 車天車地 R33 冇意中發現呢條連結 56 of the Worst Cars of All Time 覺得都幾有趣.大部分是美國車, 但其中幾架香港都有 R33 車迷不少, 不如開個車壇 post, 揀d車出黎吹下水, 好過日日政治爭拗 [車天車地] 係俗語, 大把人用緊, 雖然冇 copyright 問題, 都加埋 R33 落去 http://www.carophile.org/the-worst-cars-of-all-time/22/ |
mrbeansr 正式會員61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-13 23:45 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 車天車地 R33 仲有Reliant Robin, Lada...... 最後修改時間: 2017-04-14 01:42:56 |
我是一個人 正式會員 168.xxx.xxx.133 |
2017-04-14 01:42 |
| [#3] 車天車地 R33 F50 都入選 the Worst Cars of All Time, 哈哈.  最後修改時間: 2017-04-14 02:11:12 |
S.Chan 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.36 |
2017-04-14 01:58 |
| [#4] 車天車地 R33 另外有 Best Looking Cars to Buy in 2017 第 18 的 2016 Ford Focus RS 同我架 Fiesta 都似似o地.  最後修改時間: 2017-04-14 02:00:55 |
S.Chan 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.36 |
2017-04-14 02:00 |
| [#5] 車天車地 R33 [#2] 車天車地 R33 仲有Reliant Robin, Lada...... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 屎痾凸, 又稱是9但 (斯柯達)都冇入  |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 10:06 |
| [#6] 車天車地 R33 BM 有三架都係 "渣" 車黎 (47) 318ti (54) 2002 "柒" 糸 - 實至名歸! (56) X6 |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 10:24 |
| [#7] 車天車地 R33 Re #3 條 link 話 F50 worst car 係非常偏見 係單指外型而言 “ugliest Ferrari ever built”, 各花入各眼, 大把拉利 fans 不同意 The engine was powerful, with a whopping 513 horsepower at the rear wheels. The Suspension perfectly tuned, letting the F50 handle corners like the supercar that it is. Those faithful to Ferrari gobbled up the less than 400 produced by Ferrari without batting an eye but the F50 was a hideous car. The Ferrari F50 is without question the ugliest Ferrari ever built. The troughs on the hood, the deep cavities in the side panels, and the wing that was a part of the rear fender all add to the hot mess that is the Ferrari F50. “A custom-made F50 variant named the Bolide was commissioned by the Sultan of Brunei in 1998... At least two cars were produced in RHD. One was for the sultan, and was subsequently bought by a collector in Ireland. Another one is now in Hong Kong”. 生產兩架 RHD? 好似係指 special version Bolide 香港有幾多 F50 RHD? 就要問 R33 拉利專家 paul 少 最後修改時間: 2017-04-14 11:38:24 |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 11:24 |
| [#8] 車天車地 R33 睇第一架已唔駛睇落去啦，1899年，佢試過未？ 又係content farm。  |
skyliner 正式會員 14.xxx.xxx.235 |
2017-04-14 12:21 |
| [#9] 車天車地 R33 唔記得舉薦讀者由尾看起 (即是 No.56), 會較熟悉 1-6 都係上古車, museum 貨色, 除非對汽車歷史有興趣 No.7 1949 Crosley Hotshot 同廠另一款小房車, 香港當年有進口 筆者當時家居元朗, 父親和一位陳姓鄉紳 (太平紳士)相熟, 後者買左一架, 話非常慳油  最後修改時間: 2017-04-14 14:32:26 |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 14:31 |
| [#10] 車天車地 R33 Full List 1899-1939 1899 Horsey Horseless 1909 Ford Model T 1911 Overland OctoAuto 1913 Scripps-Booth Bi-Autogo 1920 Briggs and Stratton Flyer 1933 Fuller Dymaxion 1934 Chrysler/Desoto Airflow 1940-1959 1949 Crosley Hotshot 1956 Renault Dauphine 1957 King Midget Model III 1957 Waterman Aerobile 1958 Ford Edsel 1958 Lotus Elite 1958 MGA Twin Cam 1958 Zunndapp Janus 1960-1974 1961 Amphicar 1961 Corvair 1966 Peel Trident 1970 AMC Gremlin 1970 Triumph Stag 1971 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron Two-Door Hardtop 1971 Ford Pinto 1974 Jaguar XK-E V12 Series III 1975-1989 1975 Bricklin SV1 1975 Morgan Plus 8 Propane 1975 Triumph TR7 1975 Trabant 1976 Aston Martin Lagonda 1976 Chevy Chevette 1978 AMC Pacer 1980 Corvette 305 "California" 1980 Ferrari Mondial 8 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood V-8-6-4 1981 De Lorean DMC-12 1982 Cadillac Cimarron 1982 Camaro Iron Duke 1984 Maserati Biturbo 1985 Mosler Consulier GTP 1985 Yugo GV 1986 Lamborghini LM002 1990-Present 1995 Ford Explorer 1997 GM EV1 1997 Plymouth Prowler 1998 Fiat Multipla 2000 Ford Excursion 2001 Jaguar X-Type 2001 Pontiac Aztek 2002 BMW 7-series 2003 Hummer H2 2004 Chevy SSR http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1658545,00.html |
我是一個人 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.53 |
2017-04-14 14:35 |
| [#11] 車天車地 R33 Jaguar X-Type 簡直係Ford強姦Jaguar既產品。 Ford Pinto 直頭係當年讀書時既Case Study |
我是一個人 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.53 |
2017-04-14 14:49 |
| [#12] 車天車地 R33 人哥條 link 冇呢架? 56. 2007 BMW X6 Called “The stupidest car in the world” by Top Gear the BMW X6 is an odd design choice for BMW. Dubbed a sports activity vehicle by BMW, the X6 is a mixture of SUV and sports sedan. Sadly the X6 doesn’t perform either of those functions well. Looks-wise the X6 succeeds, with a mixture of SUV stance and sports sedan styling, performance-wise it’s another story. The tall driving position gives the X6 too high a center of gravity to be able to navigate corners like a sports car, while the off-road capabilities of the X6 don’t compare to a standard SUV. Over the years the X6 has found its stride, becoming better with each revision, but the first run X6 was a less than impressive merging of two worlds.  |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 14:50 |
| [#13] 車天車地 R33 [#11] Ford Pinto 直頭係當年讀書時既 Case Study ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://users.wfu.edu/palmitar/Law&Valuation/Papers/1999/Leggett-pinto.html THE FORD PINTO CASE: THE VALUATION OF LIFE AS IT APPLIES TO THE NEGLIGENCE-EFFICIENCY ARGUMENT Christopher Leggett Law & Valuation Professor Palmiter Spring, 1999 Abstract The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis. ISSUE Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in design or manufacturing could lead to death or seriously bodily harm, such as in the Ford Pinto situation? RULE There are arguments both for and against such an analysis. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account. ANALYSIS Although Ford had access to a new design which would decrease the possibility of the Ford Pinto from exploding, the company chose not to implement the design, which would have cost $11 per car, even though it had done an analysis showing that the new design would result in 180 less deaths. The company defended itself on the grounds that it used the accepted risk/benefit analysis to determine if the monetary costs of making the change were greater than the societal benefit. Based on the numbers Ford used, the cost would have been $137 million versus the $49.5 million price tag put on the deaths, injuries, and car damages, and thus Ford felt justified not implementing the design change. This risk/benefit analysis was created out of the development of product liability, culminating at Judge Learned Hand's BPL formula, where if the expected harm exceeded the cost to take the precaution, then the company must take the precaution, whereas if the cost was liable, then it did not have to. However, the BPL formula focuses on a specific accident, while the risk/benefit analysis requires an examination of the costs, risks, and benefits through use of the product as a whole. Based on this analysis, Ford legally chose not to make the design changes which would have made the Pinto safer. However, just because it was legal doesn't necessarily mean that it was ethical. It is difficult to understand how a price can be put on saving a human life. There are several reasons why such a strictly economic theory should not be used. First, it seems unethical to determine that people should be allowed to die or be seriously injured because it would cost too much to prevent it. Second, the analysis does not take into all the consequences, such as the negative publicity that Ford received and the judgments and settlements resulting from the lawsuits. Also, some things just can't be measured in terms of dollars, and that includes human life. However, there are arguments in favor of the risk/benefit analysis. First, it is well developed through existing case law. Second, it encourages companies to take precautions against creating risks that result in large accident costs. Next, it can be argued that all things must have some common measure. Finally, it provides a bright line which companies can follow. |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 15:03 |
| [#14] 車天車地 R33 Worst car No. 29 Morgan Plus 8 Propane ----------------------------------------------------------------- Morgan 香港有, Plus 8 就唔 sure 一般 Morgan 當然唔會用 propane gas 作動力 老美將佢 modified “with a tank of propane hanging behind the rear bumper” 就非常牙煙 In the early 70’s the U.S. emissions and safety standards became more strict, and Morgan ended up having to stop selling cars in the US. In an effort to continue the life of the Morgan Plus 8, Bill Fink, a rich car dealer, managed to retrofit a Buick/Rover 8 and get it running on propane. For a few years people were driving around with a tank of propane hanging behind the rear bumper, making the Morgan Plus 8 almost as dangerous as the Pinto.  |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-14 18:39 |
| [#15] 車天車地 R33 鴉姐隔離 posted saab V4 希望佢唔介意老鬼 hijack 過黎吹水 呢架 V4 似係 2000 年 SAAB 被 GM 收購後產品, 有錯請指正   最後修改時間: 2017-04-28 17:01:06 |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-28 16:59 |
| [#16] 車天車地 R33 SAAB 於 1945 在瑞典成立, 早期 models 係 2 stroke, 2-3 cylinders Wiki 話 “The first Saab two-stroke engine was based on a DKW design”. DKW 係德國厰, 最初生產電單車, 其後生產汽車, audi 前身 50 年代香港有 saab 和 DKW 在街行駛, 都係 2-stroke 老鬼 60 年代亦買過架二手 DKW 圖一係 saab 圖二係 DKW 和法國 simca   最後修改時間: 2017-04-28 17:28:38 |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-28 17:26 |
| [#17] 車天車地 R33 #15: 呢架 V4 似係 2000 年 SAAB 被 GM 收購後產品, 有錯請指正 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 錯! 係 67 年買老美 Ford engine In 1967, Saab began marketing the 96V4, with the Ford Taunus V4 engine, a four-stroke 1498 cc V4 engine, originally developed for the 1962 Ford Taunus 15M. Saab's project to source a four-stroke engine was dubbed 'Operation Kajsa'. |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-28 19:22 |
| [#18] 車天車地 R33 DKW 約 58 年間, 返工附近有老闆用呢架， 顏色一式一樣， 驚為天人。 以 50 年代車款計， 亦算頂級?  |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-29 17:52 |
| [#19] 車天車地 R33 數年後 (60’s) 某天, 身為 car sales 細佬話: “大佬, 有行家收到你既 dream car, 去唔去睇?” 當然立即去 其時 DKW 已成孤兒車, 即是車厰結業停產 (1964 被 VW 收購). 經紀數月賣不出, 又係行家, 還價即成. 該車仲係 cabriolet, 3 cylinders 2 stroke, 所以稱為 3=6 有 freewheel drive, 入左呢個波, 收油就 clutch disengaged 變成 N 波 跣 gliding 住去 與 overdrive 不同. 聽說當時美國大車 Lincoln 有此設備  |
mrbeansr 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.207 |
2017-04-29 18:41 |
| [#20] 車天車地 R33 豆Sir, 記唔記得法國車Simca? |
dlbf 正式會員 14.xxx.xxx.6 |
2017-04-30 11:34 |
