| 汽車主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 want to choose either 1; similar price, around $8x picnic - deluxe version m5 - basic one, no electric sliding door. any comments? |
hklittle 正式會員125.xxx.xxx.28 |
2011-06-06 23:29 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 M5 for sure. Remeber Picnic is released in 2000. |
AllMyFriend 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.95 |
2011-06-07 11:41 |
| [#3] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 They are not of the same class. |
CKL2 正式會員 143.xxx.xxx.2 |
2011-06-07 13:56 |
| [#4] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 Picnic : Larger cabin, cabin is more quiet than Mazda5 I reckon Mazda 5: smaller cabin, maybe better handling than the picnic |
soryedison 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.143 |
2011-06-07 14:43 |
| [#5] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 M5 is best buy.. But Toyota engine is more durable |
g2david 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.180 |
2011-06-07 14:49 |
| [#6] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 Picnic: chassis of 2000cc, more space with rear A/C Mazda5: chassis of 1500cc like Mazda3 Not of the same class! |
CKL2 正式會員 143.xxx.xxx.2 |
2011-06-07 15:21 |
| [#7] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 mazda5 個最後排係比狗坐,唔係比人坐的.. |
h9713325 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.124 |
2011-06-07 15:43 |
| [#8] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 ＞＞＞Mazda5: chassis of 1500cc like Mazda3 Mazda5 應該係 2,000 cc 的。 請參考 http://www.28car.com/sell_dsp.php?h_id=533596&h_vw=y ＞＞＞mazda5 個最後排係比狗坐,唔係比人坐的.. 作為一個 Mazda5 前車主，唔係好同意呢個講法，後座同前中排比當然係細啲同headroom少啲，但係一般小朋友坐絕對唔係問題，我個家傭（約5'高）坐都無問題。 講番樓主嘅問題，如果係成日坐7個人或5個以上嘅成年人就 Picnic, 有老人家就 Mazda5，因為唔使爬上車（當年我都係因為呢個原因買 Mazda5），仲有雙電門係非常方便（所以樓主一定要買 deluxe 版）。Picnic 就好力啲，試過同 Picnic 一齊上花園道（大家都係得兩個人），Mazda5 慢慢就跟唔上。 |
ep118 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.47 |
2011-06-08 01:11 |
| [#9] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 "試過同 Picnic 一齊上花園道（大家都係得兩個人），Mazda5 慢慢就跟唔上。" Interesting..... Picnic should have a heavier body which makes it very slow while Mazda 5 have a lighter body but slightly smaller eng. 1.8 (have 2.0 as well) |
soryedison 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.143 |
2011-06-08 09:34 |
| [#10] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 Mazda MZR 引擎低轉低扭的而且確係唔及Toyota好。不過﹐同時要知道MZR引擎係一隻Rev Happy既偈﹐上斜要拖波上高轉先得。不過要一般香港車主rev上4﹑5K轉又無乜可能﹐所以好多人話mazda車無力。 |
我是一個人 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.121 |
2011-06-08 10:05 |
| [#11] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 'Mazda5 應該係 2,000 cc 的。" The engine is 2000cc doesn't mean its 'chassis' is also as large. |
CKL2 正式會員 143.xxx.xxx.2 |
2011-06-08 10:25 |
| [#12] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 ＞＞＞mazda5 個最後排係比狗坐,唔係比人坐的.. 作為一個 Mazda5 前車主，唔係好同意呢個講法，後座同前中排比當然係細啲同headroom少啲，但係一般小朋友坐絕對唔係問題，我個家傭（約5'高）坐都無問題。 --------------------------- 就係lor,頂多可以坐小孩... 我去showroom坐過,後排真係好窄好窄喎,頂頭頂腳頂背,坐一陣都想死...如果後排要坐人,首先要犧牲中排,將中排向前推,後排先坐得入去,但係結局係中後排一齊迫到嘔.. 買mazda5,我估對d後排唔會坐人既家庭比較適合..但係後排唔坐人,買7seater又無用丫 不過8萬幾budget...點解唔搵05年車既mazda8...,內籠又闊又靚,又最好力... 最後修改時間: 2011-06-08 16:04:25 |
h9713325 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.124 |
2011-06-08 16:02 |
| [#13] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 http://www.28car.com/sell_dsp.php?h_id=499984&h_vw=y 岌一岌丫 |
h9713325 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.124 |
2011-06-08 16:07 |
| [#14] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 ＞就係lor,頂多可以坐小孩... 我去showroom坐過,後排真係好窄好窄喎,頂頭頂腳頂背,坐一陣都想死...如果後排要坐人,首先要犧牲中排,將中排向前推,後排先坐得入去,但係結局係中後排一齊迫到嘔.. 買mazda5,我估對d後排唔會坐人既家庭比較適合..但係後排唔坐人,買7seater又無用丫 作為一個M5車主，我唔係咁同意後排只坐小孩呢個講法。我不時都會坐7個人，後排都係坐大人，雖然只係正常size女士，但佢地從來都無投訴。當然啦，你係要將中排推都最後的話，小朋友坐後排都覺得迫啦。只要中排將就一下，前中後都有一個合理o既空間。如果坐足7個大人，我諗要去到previa或estima呢類先會舒服囉。 老實講，2000cc級d 7人車，車長全部都係咁上下，車入面空間就算有分別都唔大囉，你估變魔術咩 |
kimaki 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.161 |
2011-06-09 14:01 |
| [#15] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 你講m5定mazda5呀?...如果坐7個人,我估係mazda5吧.... 可能迫唔迫真係因人而異....如果2000cc 7seater,都仲有serena,noah同stepwgn揀...後座闊落好多的..就算係odyssey,都比mazda5闊好多.... 我估mazda5同picnic果d7人車,最盡都係2大+2大+2小...非必要都唔好坐7個人 |
h9713325 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.124 |
2011-06-09 14:26 |
| [#16] 2004 picnic vs 2006 Mazda 5 You can't compare Picnic with Mazda 5. Picnic has much more space. |
CKL2 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.168 |
2011-06-09 21:12 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
