| 汽車主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 轉灣俾巴士撞 片主似乎欠缺路面經驗 |
kimaki 正式會員61.xxx.xxx.187 |
2013-02-19 23:47 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 轉灣俾巴士撞 可能太專心.....又收音機.....又有囡囡傾計 |
carvan 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.223 |
2013-02-19 23:54 |
| [#3] 轉灣俾巴士撞 片主欠缺路面經驗 X2 長車轉彎係要偷過側邊條線, 自己渣車唔睇位就照去, 仲會比巴士公司告返轉頭. |
ctlee 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.172 |
2013-02-20 10:53 |
| [#4] 轉灣俾巴士撞 ＞＞自己渣車唔睇位就照去, 仲會比巴士公司告返轉頭. 私家車的確係on居無經驗，但係巴士公司民事告得佢乜?巴士司機都有責任係轉彎時留意死角有無障礙物(仲要部巴士囉左過隔離線偷位)。今次就係一部車嗟，下次係部單車咪撞親人囉。 |
我是一個人 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.121 |
2013-02-20 11:13 |
| [#5] 轉灣俾巴士撞 ＞但係巴士公司民事告得佢乜? 其實呢類交通意外, 巴士司機一定會報返公司, 公司一定會報警, 絕對無得私了. 今次既事, 巴士損傷好細, 可能只係花了碌前後的鐵皮, 但成班律師係晒後面, 一定會泊部車仔認輸同賠錢. ＞巴士司機都有責任係轉彎時留意死角有無障礙物(仲要部巴士囉左過隔離線偷位)。 條車睇得好清楚, 部巴士超過一半車身已經過晒部車仔既車頭仲入到車仔條線, 車仔係唔夠位去都要去, 而且判斷唔到巴士在彎心會好慢, 條車仲見到巴士都囉盡其右車頭到欄位咁滯, 可以講就算巴士知有事停係度, 部車仔都一樣會隊埋去. |
ctlee 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.172 |
2013-02-20 11:28 |
| [#6] 轉灣俾巴士撞 個巴士佬已經一早見到架私家車，巴士已經好慢睇佢想點，點知架車仔停下又行下，巴士佬都望後鏡見佢冇再前咪望前面轉灣囉，點前架車仔又突然隊前喎，巴士佬真係比佢玩死左，架車仔真係以為自己可以同巴士平排一齊轉，唔係聽到條片既車仔入面既對話我仲以為係架車仔特登玩野隊巴士潻呀！ |
chrisreview 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.42 |
2013-02-20 16:25 |
| [#7] 轉灣俾巴士撞 片主呢條片對自己真係好不利，如果冇呢條片話自己一早入左位先之後巴士先埋嚟就成個故事唔同哂 |
chrisreview 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.205 |
2013-02-20 16:32 |
| [#8] 轉灣俾巴士撞 其實樓上班 Ching 知唔知有「正線優先」原則嘅呢？ 雖則事主唔太夠經驗，但佢行正線，完全冇過界，仲行得幾左添！比巴士壓過嚟仲要賠？有冇搞錯！！！ 巴士左轉時其實過咗線幾乎三份一，呢個世界係冇「合法偷位」呢樣嘢嘅，否則揸大車嘅咪奉旨舞龍咁舞？！ 本人在該區工作，熟悉該區路面情況，嗰個灣位其實一D都唔窄，駛乜咁偷位？仲有，Ching 請留意條片最尾突咗個頭架黑色車位置，以此參考，你就知架巴士點過晒線嘞！ 最後修改時間: 2013-02-20 17:08:34 |
Gundam-man 正式會員 1.xxx.xxx.185 |
2013-02-20 17:07 |
| [#9] 轉灣俾巴士撞 法理巴士輸, 道理片主輸.. |
mcdull 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.140 |
2013-02-20 17:12 |
| [#10] 轉灣俾巴士撞 big doesn't mean can just turn when feel like and push other car off the road. from what i saw, my opion is all bus driver's fault. look at how early it turned and besdie that he is the one to make sure the left is clear when he cut the corner. he wouldn't have turned like he did if he konw the priviate car was there. i am sure the bus driver encouter driver like the one on the left all the time, and surely they know what to do, i guess the bus diver simply let that happen by mistake, didn't expect that car appear that at the moment. i also agree that the private car did put itself into a very dangerous place which we should all remeber and learn a lesson. I know that road well and that corner, i never expect a bus has to cut this much, unless the left lane is really'EMPTY'! 最後修改時間: 2013-02-20 17:39:50 |
seanbeer 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.66 |
2013-02-20 17:24 |
| [#11] 轉灣俾巴士撞 巴士佬以為其他車實要讓佢啫. 錯了... 私家車唔讓令到塞晒又成車人等又要整車.. 也錯了. |
mcdull 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.140 |
2013-02-20 17:26 |
| [#12] 轉灣俾巴士撞 also, go to google map take a look how 'wide' the road is. 3 lanes mate! |
seanbeer 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.66 |
2013-02-20 17:38 |
| [#13] 轉灣俾巴士撞 私家車轉入左線時，巴士已打cut右燈。當時巴士未能cut右，以照行原本的線，無理由快過架私家車的。 註：2條線可以轉右 一般轉彎時，旁邊是長車，也不會兩車平衡轉彎吧！ |
1 正式會員 14.xxx.xxx.3 |
2013-02-20 17:39 |
| [#14] 轉灣俾巴士撞 修改：2條線可以轉左！ （太激動，覺得架巴士吾岩，私家車經驗少） |
1 正式會員 14.xxx.xxx.3 |
2013-02-20 17:41 |
| [#15] 轉灣俾巴士撞 Agreed Gundam-man!! 到底有幾多駕駛人士係明白"正線"呢個道理架? 有咩交通意外, 主要都係睇線位, 除非有其他有力證據, 否則法庭都係睇線位去判決. 所以線位係一個非常重要既理據. 就算私家車司機路面經驗唔足夠, 但佢行緊自己條行車線, 咁又有咩錯呢? 好多人話夠經驗既話, 就可以行慢D, 俾架巴士行先, 咁就可以避免呢單交通意外, 呢點我認同的. 但從另一角度睇, 要一個守規則既人去忍讓另一位違反規則既人, 那又是否合理呢? 有句話叫"潛移默化", 當某D人成日做出違反規則的行為, 而冇人提出指控, 就會習以為常, 成日做出直接/間接危害他人既行為. 現在係馬路上私駕駛人士的態度, 比起10年或之前魯莽/自私好多, 有冇諗吓點解會有咁既現象呢? 而家有車CAM, 直係係一件非常好既事, 大家互相監視, 等過一段時間後, 相信交通意外會相對減少. 最後修改時間: 2013-02-20 17:46:08 |
fmchan 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.39 |
2013-02-20 17:44 |
| [#16] 轉灣俾巴士撞 私家車轉入左線時，巴士已打cut右燈。當時巴士未能cut右，以照行原本的線，無理由快過架私家車的。 there is no need a reason for where the privite car was but I guess one reason was due to the lane changing civic in front. |
seanbeer 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.66 |
2013-02-20 17:45 |
| [#17] 轉灣俾巴士撞 any please do not laugh at either drivers, accident just happens, both drivers could be good and expereinced driver, just a mistake will lead to this. I call myself sensible driver, but everytime when i crushed or streched my car. I look back, i think it shouldn't happen with my expereince and skill. but it will happen when it happen, it just happen. just like in the video. 最後修改時間: 2013-02-20 17:52:37 |
seanbeer 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.66 |
2013-02-20 17:51 |
| [#18] 轉灣俾巴士撞 同意seanbeer同mcdull等ching所講，私家車司機明顯係經驗不足，但最尾導致意外既主要責任，係巴士，始終係佢過左去人地條線。大巴偷位係正常既，但佢好明顯無好好偷盡右邊位，再加上偷位時無留意左邊線有無車，特別係後者，上到庭就已經係死罪。 |
kimaki 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.161 |
2013-02-20 18:00 |
| [#19] 轉灣俾巴士撞 全程睇佢揸車豫豫疑疑，應該係 P 牌未戒奶， 其實佢同巴士平排轉灣，只要繼續保持車速， 甚至快過巴士，就唔會俾佢拖到， 正正欠缺經驗，見到巴士壓埋黎唔敢行， 但停正灣位，即係擺個車角响到， 巴士就繼續轉，咁就拖到應一應。 |
singkee1 正式會員 42.xxx.xxx.105 |
2013-02-20 18:12 |
| [#20] 轉灣俾巴士撞 if A forget to do shoulder turn and changed lane and crushed into B. Can we say B is inexperienced and drive in A's blind spot for too long? and B deserved to get crashed? and not all fault is A's? One can say 100 ways to avoid this accident. IF..this .IF..that..IF...Vettel was driving the car, if it was a ferrari... but the big IF, is IF the priviate car really is inexperience and drove to that postion at that point of time, could the accdient be avoided? I think it could, if the bus driver was more careful 最後修改時間: 2013-02-20 18:22:05 |
seanbeer 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.66 |
2013-02-20 18:19 |
