| 汽車主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 想買架車代歩，每天元朗來回奧海城，想問擁有以上三架車既師兄，每KM行幾錢。謝謝。 |
russianhacker 正式會員110.xxx.xxx.138 |
2012-02-20 08:20 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 All three are compact sports sedan, gas milage are all about the same, as your driving style would have more influence. The key issue should be maintenance since usually after 4-5 years, problems start to surface. |
letsrock 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.107 |
2012-02-20 09:41 |
| [#3] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 Hi Letsrock Ching, you are right. I know this issue and wonder BMW will be more trobule comparing to Japanses car. But the market price for IS250 and BMW 3 series are quite close. |
russianhacker 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.129 |
2012-02-20 23:03 |
| [#4] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 New version of 3 series is much better that olds |
manz 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.98 |
2012-02-20 23:32 |
| [#5] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 330 可能會慳油啲, 因為你差唔多全程高速公路. 我部 E92 330, 都係行屯門公路多, 折埋大約 $1.80/KM (進取形揸法) |
*DIY* 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.48 |
2012-02-21 00:59 |
| [#6] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 The budget can buy a brand new Golf GT which can do $1/KM(~6l/100km) in highway driving. A good choice for 代歩! 最後修改時間: 2012-02-21 02:37:24 |
bngo 正式會員 183.xxx.xxx.162 |
2012-02-21 02:36 |
| [#7] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 Yes Ching, I know golf is more efficient but golf is too small for carrying babycar seat. |
russianhacker 正式會員 183.xxx.xxx.86 |
2012-02-21 23:26 |
| [#8] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 I have no problem to setup a baby car seat and put a babycar in the boot of my Golf. However, Golf is surely lower grade than above models indeed :-) |
bngo 正式會員 123.xxx.xxx.45 |
2012-02-22 10:01 |
| [#9] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 Personally, I think IS 250 is over priced, but then the tech behind the engine is more advanced. 325 is a safe bet, with more fun when it comes to handling. MarkX is relatively old tech/design but then parts are easy to find. |
letsrock 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.107 |
2012-02-22 10:26 |
| [#10] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 In spite of brand name, IS250 is a good car, handling is comparable to BMW325, though with less power when compare with 325, IS250 is more comfortable and with full options (for"Luxury" version). If drive mainly in highway, it cost around $1.6-1.8/km. only, a 2008 BMW 3 series should cost you more ! |
Ming Sir 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.243 |
2012-02-22 15:34 |
| [#11] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 330仲慳油過325？此話何解師兄。叧外想知2009年嘅325同2010年外觀上有咩分別？facelife點解？ |
russianhacker 正式會員 183.xxx.xxx.86 |
2012-02-23 01:48 |
| [#12] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 如果長期行Highway, 330比325慳油 facelift係美化 |
musicmonstor 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.198 |
2012-02-24 23:57 |
| [#13] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 why? 330 is less fuel consumption than 325? really want to know the reason? Thank Ching |
russianhacker 正式會員 183.xxx.xxx.86 |
2012-02-25 14:24 |
| [#14] 2008年IS250vsMarkXVsBMW325 ＞ 330 is less fuel consumption than 325? 330 行 100KM 大約係 2000RPM, 但 325 行100KM 應該要 2500RPM 左右. 以我所知 323 仲食油.... 因為車身差唔多一樣重但馬力細. |
*DIY* 正式會員 118.xxx.xxx.210 |
2012-02-25 16:32 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
