| 談天說地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#21] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! #20 冇錯，真係想害死香港人，好彩香港人自救能力好强 |
ti 正式會員116.xxx.xxx.21 |
2020-03-13 19:07 | |
|
|
|||
| [#22] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 唔喺良心罷工醫護，邊有咁快局部封關，而家仲要承受秋後算帳，港共政府唔止抗疫無方，更加喺罪該萬死！ 抗疫全部都喺香港人同良心醫護自發的。 |
simpleman 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.162 |
2020-03-13 19:19 |
| [#23] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 我估佢原本係想香港搞到義大利咁 一來你要跪低，佢又可以做救世主 配合埋選舉工程 |
敗家仔 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.179 |
2020-03-13 19:48 |
| [#24] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 來源係華盛頓郵報定華爾街日報？HKEJ 話係前者： https://inews.hket.com/article/2589575 正如其他網友指出，武漢肺炎喺腥港低傳播率完全同淋奠狗班子茅關，其他國家領導人係輕視此肺炎及茅及時採措施抗炎而導致 |
bliss33 會員 182.xxx.xxx.107 |
2020-03-13 19:56 |
| [#25] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 香港經歷過沙士、所以香港人好知驚、唔關香港正苦事、特衰正苦連口罩都無一片比我哋。今次係香港人大家功勞。 |
老吾老 會員 119.xxx.xxx.226 |
2020-03-13 19:57 |
| [#26] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 完美係因為大部份都唔信政府,只靠自己 |
eckochin 正式會員 49.xxx.xxx.243 |
2020-03-13 19:59 |
| [#27] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 要搵D英文好些少嘅人 寫篇嘢回應該報 指正吓佢香港政府是如何不堪 市民如何自救！ 最後修改時間: 2020-03-13 20:13:28 |
伊雲士 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.32 |
2020-03-13 20:10 |
| [#28] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 首先係醫䕶 之後係香港人自己， 完。 |
Daddy^k 正式會員 1.xxx.xxx.203 |
2020-03-13 20:11 |
| [#29] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 香港同台灣一樣經言沙士、所以台灣都好醒目、唔似日本人、第一時間扮做好人送物資同口罩去武漢、on 9 9咁、而家被人屈話日本肺炎。 |
老吾老 會員 119.xxx.xxx.226 |
2020-03-13 20:21 |
| [#30] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/12/hong-kong-learned-sars-can-united-states-learn-hong-kong/ Today's WorldView Analysis Hong Kong learned from SARS. Can the United States learn from Hong Kong? By Adam Taylor March 12, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. GMT+8 HONG KONG — The traumas of recent history have informed Hong Kong’s response to the current coronavirus pandemic. An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, better known by its acronym, SARS, tore through the city in 2003, leaving 299 people dead. Keiji Fukuda, a U.S. expert on infectious diseases and former assistant director-general for health security at the World Health Organization, told Today’s WorldView that SARS and other outbreaks provided lessons for Hong Kong that it is applying today. “Virtually everybody here has been through the drill,” he said. “They know the consequences.” As cases of covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, spread around the world, countries including the United States will need to internalize some of those same approaches, Fukuda said. The United States has marked well over 1,000 cases, despite administering a limited number of tests, while Hong Kong, despite its proximity to and interconnections with mainland China, has confirmed only about 120 cases. The local government recognized the risk early and raised the alarm Jan. 4. The fears soon proved justified. The city logged its first case on Jan. 23 — the same day that China declared a lockdown in Wuhan, the epicenter of the initial outbreak. Fukuda, now head of the University of Hong Kong’s School of Public Health, said the city took the novel coronavirus so seriously in part because many people there were already accustomed to worrying about infectious diseases. “In Hong Kong it is pretty common, even without an outbreak, to see people going around in masks because they may be sick and they don’t want to infect other people,” he said. For many in Hong Kong, the habits that can help control an epidemic are quite common. That intrinsic level of consciousness may be hard for the United States and other countries to import. “I think there are lessons that the U.S. and other countries can pick up from Hong Kong,” Fukuda said, “but applying them may be difficult.” Hong Kong made investments to improve its health system after SARS, Fukuda said, funding new measures and building a major infectious disease program at the University of Hong Kong, the school at which he teaches. An official investigation led to the resignation of the city’s top health official in 2004. This time around, the city government launched a response plan well before confirming any cases. Amid pro-democracy protests, it was willing to take firm measures early on, announcing it would cancel school in late January and pushing citizens to socially distance from each other in public spaces. The world is adjusting to a new normal. In Asia, some countries are now closing in on two months of severe restrictions on daily life. Beijing has put swaths of China on lockdown. Despite the heavy toll, mainland Chinese officials are now suggesting their tactics should be emulated abroad. Critics think otherwise, and point to the chaotic Chinese response in the early days of the virus. Fukuda, for his part, sees the lockdown on Wuhan as a crucial move for stopping the virus’s spread, but doubts that similar tactics could work for long in a democracy. “It’s unimaginable for me in the U.S. that you could lock down 50 million people,” he said. In South Korea, where there are nearly 8,500 confirmed cases, mass testing of more than 10,000 individuals a day has become the norm. One reason South Korea was motivated to test so many so quickly was the memory of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), an outbreak that killed 33 people in 2015, when faulty tests abetted the spread of the virus. The United States, meanwhile, stumbled in its own efforts to develop a test. Jeremy Konyndyk, who oversaw the international response to Ebola during the Obama administration, told The Post that it reflected a slow overall reaction. “They’ve simply lost time they can’t make up. You can’t get back six weeks of blindness,” he said. Hong Kong was not the only place to react with relative rigor early on. Taiwan and Singapore have been able to keep their numbers low because of surveillance and contract tracing — in some cases raising privacy concerns. All three countries saw deaths from SARS. “Singapore has been very open about all of it’s cases and has described in detail and in near-real-time it’s epidemiological investigations,” Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in an email. There are no quick fixes, and Hong Kong’s response has been far from perfect. Some critics have argued that the Hong Kong government was too slow to impose border restrictions. The full impact of the outbreak remains to be seen, as a second wave of cases in Singapore may show. Fukuda cautioned that it is hard to compare the actions of a city of about 7 million with a country of more than 300 million. But just as Hong Kong learned from SARS, the United States may have to learn from covid-19. “The U.S. has probably two of the strongest health institutions in the world,” Fukuda said, referring to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health, but their funding goes “up and down.” It was unclear who was leading the response, he said, and who was paying for vital measures including tests — which are covered by the government in Hong Kong. “The virus is moving a lot quicker than the [United States] is going to move,” he said. |
我是一個人 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.239 |
2020-03-13 20:23 |
| [#31] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 樓主果幅圖翻譯出問題啦，原文係“There are no quick fixes, and Hong Kong’s response has been far from perfect.”係....香港嘅反應同完美仲有一大段距離 |
我是一個人 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.239 |
2020-03-13 20:33 |
| [#32] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! D 新豬 都係廿廿烏... 最後修改時間: 2020-03-13 20:41:36 |
伊雲士 正式會員 112.xxx.xxx.32 |
2020-03-13 20:38 |
| [#33] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 其實有三樣嘢要多謝 第一 , 要多謝班年青人 , 令到大陸冇乜人嚟香港 , 啲大陸人全部去晒外國 , 減少香港疫症爆發 第二 , 多謝罷工醫護 第三 , 多謝全香港市民 , 自覺性戴口罩 , 少去人多地方 , 令疫正減少傳播 淋奠狗班子政府 , 想在今次疫症領工 , 正一仆街特衰正苦 , 你何來有幫過香港人對抗疫症 |
ASDF22 會員 223.xxx.xxx.129 |
2020-03-13 22:01 |
| [#34] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 只有在廢柴政府下，先至做就高質素香港人，呢個政府不配管治高質香港人。 |
一號2世 正式會員 123.xxx.xxx.2 |
2020-03-13 22:13 |
| [#35] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 翻譯外電嘅 HKEJ 刀係童子軍跳彈床，求L 其其，原文係各摑幾巴，只不過港燦受過沙士洗禮，人人自危反應迅速及自我約制，其他國家或輕視或因浪漫民風，煮到來至食成迅速 蔓延瀰禍 |
bliss33 會員 182.xxx.xxx.107 |
2020-03-13 22:20 |
| [#36] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 不信共產黨，就係一個防疫既好良方 |
dennis815 會員 42.xxx.xxx.68 |
2020-03-14 01:42 |
| [#37] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 不信共產黨，就係一個防疫既好良方 |
dennis815 會員 42.xxx.xxx.68 |
2020-03-14 01:42 |
| [#37] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! 不信共產黨，就係一個防疫既好良方 |
dennis815 會員 42.xxx.xxx.68 |
2020-03-14 01:42 |
| [#39] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! I do agree that the Chinese interpretation seems a little bit exaggerating about the report. It looks like it is aimed to give out some positive vibes. It may not be justifiable but once in a while I believe people in Hong Kong deserve some credits. That said is there such thing "Prefect"? Perhaps it could be described in sports or competition as prefect when score 10,100 or full marks. When dealing with delicate situation/crisis/problem I would take comfort when it is described as far from prefect. It's still better than "devastating ", "catastrophic", "tragic", "missed opportunity" or "damaging". When they claim HK has learnt lessons from the past and prepares well when the crisis arises and it asks the question if USA could do it and I can assert that Hong Kong People should be proud from this notion. |
fotheringay 正式會員 81.xxx.xxx.52 |
2020-03-14 02:32 |
| [#40] 華爾街日街讚香港防疫“超完美”! Low input from Govt, high output from average citizens, what do you expect, output/input? |
alexanderkoo 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.246 |
2020-03-14 09:54 |
