| 談天說地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20240202/mobile/bkn-20240202121040531-0202_00822_001.html 港大前副教授張祺忠殺妻囚終身 上訴得直撤銷定罪發還重審 最後修改時間: 2024-02-03 16:04:35 |
tttt123456 會員124.xxx.xxx.123 |
2024-02-03 16:00 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 This JR is more understandable. Having a piece of wire doesn't mean it's well planned beforehand. Similar for having knives in kitchen unless bought before homicide. Besides, even his kids asked for pardon. The other carbon monoxide one is more outrageous. Prison must be very full to make way for others. |
alexanderkoo 正式會員 223.xxx.xxx.199 |
2024-02-03 16:31 |
| [#3] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 用抑鬱做擋箭牌 |
沉默的膏蟹 正式會員 14.xxx.xxx.191 |
2024-02-03 16:47 |
| [#4] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 Basically appeal for manslaughter误杀 only, hence fixed sentence say 10 years or so. Not exactly innocent and immediate release from prison. Similarly in the States downgrading from first degree murder to second degree murder. 最後修改時間: 2024-02-03 17:16:46 |
alexanderkoo 正式會員 223.xxx.xxx.199 |
2024-02-03 17:15 |
| [#5] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 有錢就可以聘請 6C 團隊，一個個細微動作找理由， 個波都可以証明科學上自己會漏氣，異點利益歸被告作脱罪！！ 冇錢？？？？認咗佢算了！ |
CS168 正式會員 42.xxx.xxx.175 |
2024-02-03 17:41 |
| [#6] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 再次接軌，有錢就有道理 |
vitz 正式會員 85.xxx.xxx.41 |
2024-02-03 18:06 |
| [#7] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 ＃4 如果改判誤殺 ,刑期就大不同 . 佢已經 拋咗 六年 ,隨時即時放人 |
tttt123456 會員 124.xxx.xxx.123 |
2024-02-03 19:19 |
| [#8] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 This is the goal of the barrister. The case for Mr. Cheung is understandable though not necessarily excusable. The winner is always the lawyer, at least 0.2M in studying the case and transcript. $7,000/HR. for SC. min 2 weeks in court. Even 2 million is nothing when compared to life sentence. Also seeking for justice. 最後修改時間: 2024-02-04 08:52:30 |
alexanderkoo 正式會員 223.xxx.xxx.199 |
2024-02-04 08:49 |
| [#9] 有錢/冇錢 請律師的分別 In law, murder is the unlawful killing of another person with malice aforethought. The questions need to be answered: 1. Was there a killing? If this Q was satisfied, go to Q2; 2. Was the killing unlawful? The above Qs fulfil one of the elements of murder, actus reus. Actus Reus refers to the physical or external element of a criminal act, encompassing the conduct, consequences, and surrounding circumstances that must be established for a defendant to be held criminally responsible. Was there any malice aforethought on the part of the Defendant? This is the mental element, "mens rea" needed to be proved. Malice aforethought refers to the intention or knowledge of causing death or serious bodily harm to another person. 要把被告定罪，控方需證明該罪控含上述兩元素，缺一或其一或全部，都不可足夠把被告定罪。 |
degalle 會員 125.xxx.xxx.63 |
2024-02-04 10:40 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
