| 談天說地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 慘絕人寰的種族滅絕！ 大家請廣傳！這個滅絕人性的政權天諸地滅！ |
maga 會員157.xxx.xxx.102 |
2021-04-12 00:45 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 迫你打針食藥、捉曬啲成人入營虐待，遺下孩子在家，其他人唔準幫助，滅絕人性的種族清洗，仲辯駁人口自然增長一倍！其實係用漢人去代替！DKLMCH ! |
S.Cheung 正式會員 182.xxx.xxx.108 |
2021-04-12 01:06 |
| [#3] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 Neither you nor I have been to Xinjiang, so don't take sides, stay at the sidelines. 最後修改時間: 2021-04-12 09:59:50 |
muey 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.91 |
2021-04-12 09:57 |
[#4] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性  |
lym 正式會員 165.xxx.xxx.97 |
2021-04-12 10:11 |
| [#5] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 #3 係喎，中国嘅人權同自由一向頂瓜瓜又唔會收買鬼佬做五毛 |
olddude 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.242 |
2021-04-12 10:14 |
| [#6] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 #3 五毛真係無處不在努力工作呀！叫佢埋沒良知比叫佢食屎更容易！這個可恥民族必須滅亡！ |
S.Cheung 正式會員 138.xxx.xxx.2 |
2021-04-12 11:37 |
| [#7] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 #3 夠膽你就出嚟公開辯論對質！不之所謂！泯滅良知！你收幾錢呀？小心天誅地滅喎，可恥！ |
genius.me 會員 185.xxx.xxx.23 |
2021-04-12 12:04 |
| [#8] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 #3 "those complained about Xinjiang were all been outside China and never have stepped foot in Xinjiang". Then why you don't trust what those people, who escaped from Xinjiang, said? There is not only one but many of them have shared the same observation and experience in Xinjiang. |
Wait4U 正式會員 89.xxx.xxx.165 |
2021-04-12 12:36 |
| [#9] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 #3 亞爺養唔少呢亭毒蟲，典型芬太洛樣 |
BB1668 會員 113.xxx.xxx.225 |
2021-04-12 12:39 |
| [#10] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 早二日楊局長話國家講左新疆新聞是假的⋯⋯ |
lb1i 正式會員 49.xxx.xxx.196 |
2021-04-12 13:20 |
| [#11] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 其實成個新疆都係假的，地球上自古以黎都無呢個地方 |
H9713325 正式會員 49.xxx.xxx.28 |
2021-04-12 14:13 |
| [#12] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 19 羊膶腸焗腸蝈家話乜就傳聲，叫企仆街企即刻仆，毋須用個放喺籮抽度個羊腦思考^_^ 成日話自古以來，當日點解叫「新」彊？ 千九幾年該地刀係匈奴，西域人自治，漢朝搵張騫通西域，王昭君和番，證明該地由當地人管治，後來乾隆再入去，以至認民國政府管治，民國政府退守台灣，致有襠覬覦並派王軍此殺人王入彊，並歷年高壓治理屠當地人，聲稱要去過至了解事件，寫西文替襠辯護，正一西狗^_^ |
bliss33 會員 218.xxx.xxx.122 |
2021-04-12 18:57 |
| [#13] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 Well, did anyone takes notice of Taiwan's position on Xinjiang cotton? Being a neighboring geographic location, Taiwan knows well it is a US tactic to drag China's development. Does US care anything about Xinjiang? Honestly, they don't give a shit. Taiwan at most (do correct me) has had some individual legislative councilors saying to boycott Winter Olympic Games of Beijing. Nothing more than that. |
muey 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.88 |
2021-04-30 21:08 |
| [#14] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 English Choi 連香港呢個恩人都唔幫拖，點會對新彊問題出聲？ 不過雖然有尐唔爽，但唔會怪佢。 |
Dlbf 正式會員 223.xxx.xxx.138 |
2021-04-30 21:17 |
| [#15] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 台灣自己都有危險，也在夾縫中生存緊。 |
呀金 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.153 |
2021-04-30 21:21 |
| [#16] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 寶島唔高調去辣㷫對岸隻癲狗係恰當嘅，唔似嗰邊慣伎利用愚論去古惑人心 |
bliss33 會員 218.xxx.xxx.127 |
2021-04-30 22:18 |
| [#17] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 But all Western allies are taking pressure from the US administration to take side, if Taiwan is living in danger, why would US allows Taiwan to stay at sidelines? By the way, the value of this forum is to express opinions from different angles. We are learned to treasure that. |
muey 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.88 |
2021-04-30 22:46 |
| [#18] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 "those complained about Xinjiang were all been outside China and never have stepped foot in Xinjiang". Then why you don't trust what those people, who escaped from Xinjiang, said? There is not only one but many of them have shared the same observation and experience in Xinjiang. x 2 |
mkchanhk 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.139 |
2021-04-30 22:52 |
| [#19] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 #17 I believe this forum cherish reasonable opinion but not those opinion contradict themselves or ignore all other facts present. #13 It is a corporate choice to use Xinjiang cotton or not. A country with democracy won't bother to control/enforce local corporates as long as they did not violate any local law. Thus, I don't know how you can conclude that Taiwan knows well it is a US tactic to drag China's development. Some countries prefer to boycott the Winter Olympic as a way to protest against China while some countries might not believe such boycott is meaningful. As an example, US did not boycott the 1936 Olympics finally but did it represent US endorse Hitler's Reich? P.S. Your comment explicitly admit that Taiwan has her own sovereignty which is not part of China. Be careful! 最後修改時間: 2021-05-01 00:00:19 |
Wait4U 正式會員 192.xxx.xxx.69 |
2021-04-30 23:52 |
| [#20] 訪問新疆人，滅絕人性 Your P.S. is a valid point, but I was just referring to present fact without describing Taiwan as a country. No one would argue that. My proposition was that Taiwan was demanded by US for its protection to do this do that in the past, but on this Xinjiang Uyghur incident, they kept silence. Indeed, I was speculating the concluding reason for Taiwan government's inaction. Bloomberg also reported that the Japan's Suga administration were forced to take side. |
muey 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.88 |
2021-05-01 08:32 |
