| 影音軟件主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] HQCD K2HD LPCD I am just using a very ordinary CDP and a MF M3i amp and AE 100 speakers. I found that HQCD and K2HD sound clearly better than just normal CD but LPCD45, LPCDM2 or LPCD 1630 do not sound better than normal CD in my system... Anybody has the same experience or it is just system's problem?? |
justmusic 正式會員219.xxx.xxx.224 |
2011-08-09 21:03 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] HQCD K2HD LPCD the sound of orginal CD is better than LPCD , and LPCD is better than K2HD. This is my personal report from ALan Tam and Teresa Teng |
raymondlau1997 正式會員 124.xxx.xxx.44 |
2011-08-25 20:57 |
| [#3] HQCD K2HD LPCD 一般人聽音樂都會覺得聽到好多野就係錄得好, 呢D朋友好適合聽remastered版本CD, 壓縮音場再加reverb, 乜都大大聲咁放哂出黎就好. 但又有另一班燒得仲癲既朋友覺得音場比例最重要. 人聲比例, 邊種樂器擺邊度先係至重要. 呢兩類人係永遠無法達成協議既. 做生意講求成本效益, 所以點解好多明知實炒得起既碟會出N咁多個版本, 而另一D從未出過CD既可惜蟲就永遠得個等字, 咪就係效益高既碟就係咁出. 如果本地既發燒友之中, 大部份都係"一般人", 咁做生意既, 好自然就出D乜都放哂出黎但無音場既CD黎迎合佢地, 因為多人會買嘛. 相反如果個個發燒友都係注重音場比例既, 後期版既製作人仲唔投其所好咪聽乞米? 所以有咁既需求先會有咁既貨色. 最後修改時間: 2011-08-25 21:38:04 |
kencheung810 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.33 |
2011-08-25 21:22 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
