影音軟件主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期 |
[#1] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 聽了多年Lily的碟,由2002年她的"心曲"到今年的1.825M,覺得陳潔麗的聲線都是那麼悠揚悅耳,歌藝還不斷的在改進。 見很網友評論此碟(蓮A我部份玩AV的朋友)都說今次比醉花蔭的差。但我個人卻認為今次的CD,明顯的錄音手法與以往的不同,錄出來的效果較之前的相當有立體感及有音牆,人聲更加驕媚;但耐何有很多朋友稱此碟很薄聲、冇低頻、音效差。相反的,覺得今次此碟像是特別"茩"超低頻,好多首歌的配樂堙A低頻都是一下下的 ‘UN ’出來,相當過癮的,有同感嗎?(好彩也有幾位老友認同了,並非自己主觀看法) 再 Lily的歌曲,有悽楚的零時十分,有少女情懷的1.825M,有鬼馬跳皮的膽小鬼...首首唱法都不同,有網友聽出分別嗎?大家再分享下。 |
6922Ming 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.175 |
2005-08-16 01:31 | |
|
[#2] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 非常討厭這類歌曲 |
滅絕光年2 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.46 |
2005-08-16 22:34 |
[#3] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 ""非常討厭這類歌曲"' Your comment is simple & naive! 不要扮高深,我也聽很多"高級音樂" 但各不覺得她的 音樂及演繹不好! Lily Chan is more matured & emotional in this CD! |
navyseals 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.82 |
2005-08-18 19:24 |
[#4] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 本人小小意見, 小弟到醉花蔭時而無再買, 而這隻CD係朋友借, 因為小弟覺得其唱它n似無乜突破及特別, 由第一隻到而家唱法m好似一樣, 但係其聲底確實好, 如得罪請見諒... |
rayman586 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.52 |
2005-08-19 09:41 |
[#5] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 本人小小意見, 小弟到醉花蔭時而無再買, 而這隻CD係朋友借, 因為小弟覺得其唱它n似無乜突破及特別, 由第一隻到而家唱法m好似一樣, 但係其聲底確實好, 如得罪請見諒... 我也同意你的話.聲底確唔錯.但總係提不起勁聽完整張cd |
por 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.74 |
2005-08-19 16:11 |
[#6] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 隻碟味精太重,CD機唔夠班好難噤低D味精聲 @^_^@ |
Sunnytang 正式會員 59.xxx.xxx.67 |
2005-08-20 12:16 |
[#7] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 只是大家被人拉@走,失去了自我 |
滅絕光年2 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.222 |
2005-08-20 16:03 |
[#8] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 如果說她無突破,無表現,為什蝴鴷輕鈭q手又不一視同仁對待呢?若與香港大部份歌手相比也優勝很多o |
yfl38 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.100 |
2005-08-20 18:40 |
[#9] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 只是大家被人拉住走,失去了自我, |
滅絕光年2 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.58 |
2005-08-21 00:30 |
[#10] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 ""只是大家被人拉住走,失去了自我,"" i just know i enjoy her music,i have no interests to see other people like her song or not,actually "trend" is not a main reason for me to purchase her CD! So,someone might actually like her music,but someone might be follow to the trend,you should not comment like this,its too simple!!! |
navyseals 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.82 |
2005-08-24 18:33 |
[#11] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 Full of simple & naive comments!!!!! |
navyseals 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.82 |
2005-08-24 19:11 |
[#12] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 廣東話歌曲太多﹐再加上製作簡單了點﹐可能跟所選的曲目有關﹐裡面的多數歌曲可能學生小朋友比較喜歡﹐比較挑剔的樂迷就不太喜歡啦。補充一下﹐除了第一首有低頻外﹐其他沒有太多感覺到﹐是你的器材不夠通透而加上的低頻﹐繼續BURN-IN吧 |
Dianny 正式會員 12.xxx.xxx.148 |
2005-09-02 04:52 |
[#13] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 可能好多人都話咁多年隻隻碟都差唔多,冇咩點變. 期實隻碟好多野都有進步. 期實我就唔希望妧q路變得太大. 就好似王菲咁,我由第一隻碟開始聽. 聽到中期已經好少聽.因為已經唔係我鍾意果種style. 買她的碟唔係因為要聽坁G種sTyle既歌咩. 甜美既聲線,清晰既字,為什麼一定要變呢. |
billy888 正式會員 59.xxx.xxx.203 |
2005-09-07 10:37 |
[#14] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 我也覺得低音樂器稍欠,即聽落欠低頻感覺,最明顯第一首中段起樂沒聲低音鼓或琴,所以聽起上來怪怪地,不知是否編曲問題或是錄音問題? |
cml 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.138 |
2005-09-09 14:18 |
[#15] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 Dianny Hing, You are one of the typical Hong Kong guy!!! Music,i think should be no need to "classify" into several "Level" i listen to Classics,Jazz... since 1978,i listen to almost all the great conductors & great Jazz musicians. Pls do not confused the one you are "pointing is a primary student! Also i don't think you are experienced in "high end " the words you said reflects what your level(should be lo-fi,right?) Try to think about good music is the one give you pleasure,many Classical music may not be easy to listen to (like Bruckner) so some people prefer Rachmaninov or Tchaikovsky.... I am disgusting with such a person like you!!!!! Study with more musical knowledges & shout here again!!! |
navyseals 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.82 |
2005-09-10 10:22 |
[#16] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 香港人的勢利,自已為是,對文化及音樂的認識, 令我羞!!! 難怪有"文化沙漠"之稱,信焉! |
navyseals 正式會員 202.xxx.xxx.82 |
2005-09-10 10:29 |
[#17] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 Hi,navyseals: I don't know who you are? Are you insane? I'm not gonna argue with u.I just let you know that I own hundreds of Classical music records.I don't think you have good taste in Classical and Jazz music.It is not a musical matter,it is a cultural matter,You see? That's it. |
Dianny 正式會員 12.xxx.xxx.133 |
2005-09-10 14:50 |
[#18] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 放開胸襟, 不要太執著於一種固有欣賞音樂的觀念, 你的世界將會更大!! 世界上所有的東西都是沒有完美的, 音樂也一樣, 所有的完美和缺憾都是從你的心中所想出來的, 要看遠一點, 細心觀察和暸解所有音樂背後的故事, 自然不會有這樣的爭辯!! |
alx500 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.159 |
2005-09-10 21:00 |
[#19] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 完全同意6922Ming兄的評語。人聲好正,音場通透。超值。 |
mls 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.103 |
2005-09-23 21:34 |
[#20] 為陳潔麗1.825M再評 用膽機聽更靚聲更甜。 |
mls 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.103 |
2005-09-23 21:47 |