| 影音軟件主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI;什麼是IFPI? Any C兄know that : CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI; 什麼是IFPI? 有同冇有什麼分別呢?有是否代表好声d呢? |
sheepsheep1012 正式會員113.xxx.xxx.140 |
2010-12-25 22:54 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI;什麼是IFPI? ifpi的意思是國際唱片協會,有時你會見到拍賣時,會有人問cd內圈有沒有ifpi,因為大約在93年年尾以後全球所發行的cd,內圈都要印上ifpi,93年或以前是沒有的,而音質方面當然是有分別,而且好大,基本上無ifpi的cd音質會較靚聲(尤其是日本版),因為當時日本版音質比起其他國家相對較好,質量較高,(靚聲版本)相差更遠(比起有ifpi),而普遍來講,無ifpi比有ifpi會更有收藏價值,以日本版為例,如果你在唱片鋪見到隻五輪真弓精選,年份是1986年(原版)那隻的話,這並不代表是當年發行的那隻,因為唱片公可以把當年發行的唱片,重新再發行,包括唱片local,封面同年份亦都可以完全一樣,當你買回家後,發覺內圈有ifpi的話,那就証明你手上的那隻肯定是再版碟,亦即是說只有二手cd鋪才有機會買到86年的那隻,而價錢當然會較貴,但音質方面完全是兩回事,所以你們如果買碟(舊版碟)的時候要多加留意,還要靠經驗啦! |
CD人1003 正式會員 110.xxx.xxx.127 |
2010-12-26 00:29 |
| [#3] CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI;什麼是IFPI? C hing ;你講得好長盡呀! 小弟明白晒Lu!Thank you so much !! |
sheepsheep1012 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.140 |
2010-12-26 10:20 |
| [#4] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 咁如果自己用CD-R燒CD,同出面的CD又有何不同呢? 自己燒的CD-R,是否一段時間後就read唔係好倒?if yes why? 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? THX! |
sheepsheep1012 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.140 |
2010-12-27 12:42 |
| [#5] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 你燒只試一試. |
k.c.78 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.61 |
2010-12-28 17:23 |
| [#6] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? I want to know tha answer ma! |
sheepsheep1012 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.140 |
2010-12-28 23:09 |
| [#7] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 分別之大.千言萬語說不清.最好自己燒只出來體會清楚知道有多大.同一時期同一大碟.不同產地都有分別. |
k.c.78 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.61 |
2010-12-29 14:09 |
| [#8] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 咁請問那些93年後期 T113 韓版的CD , 都會印有 IFPI ? 定係93年後期的CD已不在韓國印? many thx !!! |
rundmc06 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.14 |
2011-01-11 02:30 |
| [#9] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 韓國版發行時間大約是在85-90年這段時間,往後時間已經好少見啦!至於93年發行的cd有無ifpi,要視乎當時唱片發行時間 |
cd人1003 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.254 |
2011-01-11 13:49 |
| [#10] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 而音質方面當然是有分別,而且好大,基本上無ifpi的cd音質會較靚聲 ----------------------------------------- 何解呢 ???? 93年压有ifpi CD 就把音質一刀切了嗎 ??? 制作技術 ?? CD物料?? 把音質切了...??? 現在的靚聲碟還要買嗎 ??? 求教 Thanks |
KWCD 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.91 |
2011-01-16 02:07 |
| [#11] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 這是我個人意見,現在發行所謂靚聲碟,我自己就唔會買啦!首先這些碟是舊碟再發行,到現在已經發行過好多次,同原版已經相差好遠,同埋這些舊碟一定是愈早期愈靚聲,因為母帶損耗較少,印得愈多,音質愈差,甚麼新錄音技術都補救唔到,再加上本地錄音技術一向都好差,這就是為何有些人喜歡收藏曰本版同西德版舊碟的原因,一是早期,二是原音,加上當時它們製作cd技術已經十分成熟,質量非常好而穩定,音色絕對是一流(80-90年代初）.至於93年打後靚聲cd就愈來愈少,而且愈來愈差,更何況是本地. |
cd人1003 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.195 |
2011-01-16 12:59 |
| [#12] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 我個人認為舊版CD是原汁原味，沒有太多加工(味精)。新版CD有味精。音色上不太自然。 |
steak 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.182 |
2011-01-16 21:02 |
| [#13] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 絕對認同，就是那種真實自然的感覺，最接近母帶，原汁原味 |
cd人1003 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.40 |
2011-01-17 00:50 |
| [#14] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 90年代初，唱片業全盛時期，好似張學友，黎明，劉德華咁，個個人一出都十幾到幾十萬隻CD，香港根本無工廠可以應付到咁大需求，其實佢地全部都係由韓國SKC造，空運返黎香港既，不過無印made in Korea之嘛，但SKC既音質真係麻麻囉，反而香港harmonic印出黎既仲好過佢． |
123456789 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.231 |
2011-01-22 01:08 |
| [#15] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 關乜好聲唔好聲事，人地加 IFPI 上去只是代表隻碟係正版碟，加埋 D 數字，可以跟查製造機器，拉人封艇，打擊老翻。所以有 D 老翻碟俾人用熱焊槍"立"走 D 字o羅。 如果無字就靚聲，咁D老翻碟咪隻隻靚聲？ |
CDROMRW 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.128 |
2011-01-23 03:46 |
| [#16] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? 講...得..好!!!C兄 |
sheepsheep1012 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.166 |
2011-07-23 12:06 |
| [#17] 自己燒的CD,同正板cD音色上有何大分別呢? IFPI normally implies reissued version compared to the non-ifpi(earlier) version! the sound quality of the reissued version normally will be poor than the earlier version especially in HK CANTPOP..! Ppl. also generally knows nothing about the sound quality of the cd, so they rush to find the earlier version based on whenther the cd has pressed "IFPI" mark or not...LAW |
lyipb 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.18 |
2011-07-23 13:15 |
| [#18] CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI;什麼是IFPI? 而家都仲可以找到冇印IFPI的碟，就係Harry Belafonte at Carnegie Hall "The Complete" 一套三隻，200大元以下，好聲過所有發燒單碟版。 |
desktop 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.154 |
2011-07-23 16:10 |
| [#19] CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI;什麼是IFPI? but no IFPI 比D二手CD店抄貴晒!其實新出果D標榜是made in japan ; D声得唔得架? |
sheepsheep1012 正式會員 113.xxx.xxx.166 |
2011-07-23 17:35 |
| [#20] CD碟中見倒有印住IFPI;什麼是IFPI? From my limited observation, I guess most of the re-pressed CDs use the same digital master as the first pressing. For example, you can get the same digital master from most (if not all) pressings of the early 鄧麗君 CDs released between 1983-1988 by Polygram (though with a few exceptions), no matter it is a Sanyo pressing, T113 or even later Korea/HK pressings with IFPI codes on disc. I have done digital null tests and this is 100% accurate. Of course, sometimes there are exceptions, but I suspect this is true most of the time. So, absence of IFPI code is an excuse for speculation (i.e. 炒). You can say different pressings sound different, but then I'm going CAS~ I cannot understand why early CD pressings MUST sound better than later pressings. Silver fall-off or pinholes on Made in West Germany CDs are not that uncommon, and maybe one day all the silver will be gone and the CD becomes unplayable! If the CD could skip, I don't see how good they could sound! The presence of IFPI code does not automatically tell you that the sound is inferior. Well, there is an obvious decline in CD production quality in general, as it becomes more and more common. But the technology becomes better and more reliable as well. If a certain pressing plant would take good care with the production, I'm sure they can produce good sounding pressings nowadays even with IFPI codes on them. And re-mastering is not necessarily a bad thing. Catalogues of many important western artists were remastered to excellent results. Recent ABBA or Beatles re-releases are good example. The reason of success is that the labels really cared to look for first generation master tapes, and have them transferred properly and re-mastered to excellent taste by professional re-mastering engineers. The general bad impression of HK-pop remasters is caused by the bad work done by the incompetent engineers involved, and the lack of investment from short-sighted label executives, who don't even look for the best master tapes, and just use CD as source. I believe these poor practices are sometimes applicable to those expensive "audiophile" CDs as well. If the HK record labels do not want to invest money and effort to re-master the music properly, I would rather they re-press the CD with good technology and good pressing plant with old digital masters. I believe many of those SHM- or Blu-Spec CDs are exactly this case (which digital master was being used is mentioned on the obi). For example, I would very much like to see the first digital master of 淡淡幽情 re-pressed in Germany to the highest standard and with original artwork. I guess I could dream... Oh forgive my long post...... 最後修改時間: 2011-07-24 02:05:16 |
Brother Kei 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.233 |
2011-07-24 01:54 |
