| 影音軟件主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] CD , HQCD ,SACD , K2HD , LPCD45 , XRCD , AMCD , HD 而家D舊歌出咁多個版本 , 真想睇到眼都花 , 最慘又唔知邊個版本好 , 價錢又有差距 如果只係RIP碟用黎CAS聽 , 應該買邊個版本呢 ? |
比卡超. 正式會員202.xxx.xxx.38 |
2011-09-22 14:35 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] CD , HQCD ,SACD , K2HD , LPCD45 , XRCD , AMCD , HD cd = HQCD = K2HD = LPCD45 = XRCD = AMCD = HD = 16 44.1khz sampling sacd = 5.6M sampling |
batmanames04 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.217 |
2011-09-22 20:24 |
| [#3] CD , HQCD ,SACD , K2HD , LPCD45 , XRCD , AMCD , HD Really disappointed with AMCD despite the "blow water" review by the magazines. |
curiouskb 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.176 |
2011-09-23 17:39 |
| [#4] CD , HQCD ,SACD , K2HD , LPCD45 , XRCD , AMCD , HD Ideally if you have a nice SACD player, it should have better performance then the others - assume there is no production or quality issues with that specific SACD. In general, it would not do any wrong to go for first release of the original CD. If the first press is bad, there is slim chance of getting better with other CD formatting (basically different way to equalize and manipulate the original copy) In practice, i would recommend to experience by yourself as it has high dependency on the playback system. Personally i have slight preference for CD/SHM CD/AQCD/XRCD (not XRCD2 or XRCD24). SACD are good but the software supply is quite limited 最後修改時間: 2011-09-25 17:53:18 |
faimiu 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.190 |
2011-09-25 17:52 |
| [#5] CD , HQCD ,SACD , K2HD , LPCD45 , XRCD , AMCD , HD http://www.tweakheadz.com/16_vs_24_bit_audio.htm that's why the original AAD cd people who has high end CDP still look for it. |
notfat 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.105 |
2011-09-26 01:18 |
| [#6] CD , HQCD ,SACD , K2HD , LPCD45 , XRCD , AMCD , HD 其实在３３里已有很多师兄发表过类似的意见了。所谓什么CD什么CD实际上仍是ＲｅｄｂｏｏｋＣＤ ＝ １６／４４。在数据上绝对无优越。而且大部分这些什么CD都是把旧录音从新用什么CD发行而新的录音却用普通CD发行就不难猜想只是用“新“的什么CD来把旧录音再赚我们的钱而已。 当然与旧的CD比较音效是有所不同，但是否好了却不能一概而论。再者不同的音效不一定归功于新的什么CD，极有可能是ｒｅｍａｓｔｅｒ的结果而已。 若没有那张CD，买那些什么CD是没问题的，但已有的话，则真的无需要再买。除了多一张同样的CD外，并无什么着益！ |
MetalNuts 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.2 |
2011-09-27 14:18 |
| 按照傳送日期顯示:由舊至新 由新至舊
|
