| 影音軟件主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#1] 1812 恭喜發財， 各位資深C師兄， 請問係邊度買隻好聲1812cd？ 在那裡買？ |
vtwinhk 正式會員58.xxx.xxx.173 |
2012-01-25 22:02 | |
|
|
|||
| [#2] 1812 The most famouse is telarc 1812. You can buy in Monkok. http://www.google.com.hk/search?q=telarc+1812&hl=zh-TW&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=DUkgT8ScD4iViAeBs-2aBA&ved=0CDEQsAQ&biw=1162&bih=994 |
41450686 正式會員 210.xxx.xxx.230 |
2012-01-26 02:26 |
| [#3] 1812 水星版本好聲 |
desktop 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.36 |
2012-01-26 08:49 |
| [#4] 1812 在那裡可買到呢？ 多謝指點 |
vtwinhk 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.173 |
2012-01-26 12:22 |
| [#5] 1812 都幾難買到, 上網BID試下  |
desktop 正式會員 125.xxx.xxx.105 |
2012-01-26 15:49 |
| [#6] 1812 水星 Dorati 版不算難買，你肯網購， Amazon 賣 USD $9.61, Originals 版要 USD $10.71 |
falcongate 正式會員 76.xxx.xxx.31 |
2012-01-26 18:59 |
| [#7] 1812 go to MK "Beat" cd shop (Lady's street), there is one. |
dragoni2nd 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.122 |
2012-01-26 21:17 |
| [#8] 1812 C hing 可pm我地址嗎？ 謝謝 |
vtwinhk 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.173 |
2012-01-27 00:23 |
| [#9] 1812 This one OK London 1812 Overture / Romeo & Juliet / Marche Slave  |
newnew1 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.79 |
2012-01-27 08:34 |
| [#10] 1812 vtwinhk Hing, 這3張在旺角女人街“即怕”有得賣。祥細地址不清楚, 你去到女人街(奶路臣街入), 一定揾到。  |
dragoni2nd 正式會員 219.xxx.xxx.122 |
2012-01-27 14:51 |
| [#11] 1812 DSD version is not the best version. I prefer old version such as made in west germany by pdo. |
newnew1 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.79 |
2012-01-27 15:24 |
| [#12] 1812 still can get it? |
vtwinhk 正式會員 221.xxx.xxx.192 |
2012-01-27 18:46 |
| [#13] 1812 My Telarc - 1812 is more than 20 years old. I still saw the LP version sold at HK Record (Kowloon Tong Store) a year ago  |
bh20070101 正式會員 42.xxx.xxx.154 |
2012-01-28 01:55 |
| [#14] 1812 各位師兄， 請問呢隻1812cd好聲嗎？I heard it's quite good.. use real canon...  |
mughifi 正式會員 180.xxx.xxx.91 |
2012-02-01 21:55 |
| [#15] 1812 好聲之一  |
desktop 正式會員 218.xxx.xxx.36 |
2012-02-02 22:30 |
| [#16] 1812 呢隻1812好聲  |
mughifi 正式會員 180.xxx.xxx.91 |
2012-02-05 14:21 |
| [#17] 1812 各位33 Ching ！ 你地比左好多隻名碟出泥， 多謝多謝 請post埋係邊度買喇。 否則得個恨字@_@ |
vtwinhk 正式會員 58.xxx.xxx.173 |
2012-02-05 15:43 |
| [#18] 1812 其實1812係咪用真砲聲先夠氣勢呢？ |
ken46 正式會員 180.xxx.xxx.78 |
2012-02-05 18:09 |
| [#19] 1812 It should be Analog record better. The sound quanlity of analog record better than digital record and more natural to original. |
newnew1 正式會員 203.xxx.xxx.79 |
2012-02-06 10:21 |
| [#20] 1812 ＞＞ The sound quanlity of analog record better than digital record and more natural to original My experience is that this is not absolute; there are lousy analog recordings, and there are also digital recordings that are absolutely amazing. Often, recording techniques and engineering play larger role than the choice of analog and digital. Maybe I had too much time, I just ran through my library and found 5 versions of 1812: 1) 1at Kunzel/Cincinnati, Telarc DDD (bought like 20 years ago) 2) Bernstein/NYPO, Sony Masterworks ADD 3) Dohnanyi/VPO, Decca DDD 4) Pappano/Santa Cecilia (with Chorus), EMI DDD 5) Dorati/Minnesota, Mercury Originals ADD While (2) is great musically speaking, sonically it cannot match any of the other 4 versions. The problem with (5) is that the canon (real canon!) and bell sound exciting and realistic by themselves but do not mash well with the orchestra- the mixing is not that good. (3) captures the VPO in gorgeous sound, and the canon (electronic canon) and bell mix is very well done, but Dohnanyi's choice of tempo just robs much excitement from this version. (1) is justly famous sonically, except that it lacks a bit of warmth relatively speaking, and Kunzel does not deliver as much Russian feeling as the others. (4) has everything, except for a BIG problem- using a bass drum instead of canon is just... lame... So I have no perfect 1812. If only(5) had a better mix, or (4)had canon, or (1) had more Russian flavour... Now I am curious if the mix of (5) is intrinsic in the recording or just a bad execution in the Originals remastering. |
falcongate 正式會員 76.xxx.xxx.31 |
2012-02-06 14:35 |
