兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 下頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#110] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 before being a DSD file, the file of music or song was a multi bit file , say 24bit 96khz as the only multi bit file can be processed in a computer system. multi bit file＞sigle bit stream file ＞sacd so it is no argument that which is better when raw file originally. but the final output is depends on the performance of DAC and others so that we found DSD64 is converted from 24bit 88.1khz , you can easily convert DSD64 from dff file to wav 24bit 96khz with dff2wav.exe |
雲師兄 正式會員168.xxx.xxx.188 |
2022-03-12 19:54 | |
|
|
|||
| [#109] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 PHOTO  |
KHS 會員 219.xxx.xxx.190 |
2022-03-09 16:13 |
| [#108] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 I USE WEISS INT204 & WEISS DAC 202 LISTEN DSD FILE VERY GOOD SOUND |
KHS 會員 219.xxx.xxx.190 |
2022-03-09 16:05 |
| [#106] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 I must say I wasn't great fun of virtual downloads, as I prefer physical albums and hope that record labels will continue to put out new SACDs but the DSD downloads are really tempting! |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.74 |
2010-04-10 22:58 |
| [#105] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 finally a good information for Computer Audio enthusiasts - PS Audio will soon enable DSD files playback from the hard drive http://newsletter.psaudio.com/pdf/March_2010_Newsletter.pdf "When we want to playback the PCM stream we need a decoder (DAC) that can convert the number into a voltage and make playback snapshots appear in the same order we grabbed them during the recording. This is a pure code/decode system that tries its best to duplicate analog. It gets reasonably close if we use high sample and bit rates throughout the entire chain, as in 192kHz 24 bit high res audio files. But, let’s face it, it isn’t analog." "What’s so great about DSD? It’s analog without even a hint of digital. The closest thing I can relate it to was in my days in the recording studio where the feed right out of the microphones was just so real it was startling. DSD captures this analog perfectly. There’s not even a hint of digital in the stream - it’s truly amazing." "Over time PS Audio will find a way to support DSD because at PS Audio, the music matters most." |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.74 |
2010-04-10 22:54 |
| [#104] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 冇 title 乜 hi-rez format 都係假. 比左幾年時間佢但 SACD format 浮浮沈沈完全冇起色. 所以谷鬼氣我賣洒 d SACD 轉行玩 LP. D title 多到冇朋友又好聲. 使鬼睇唱片公司面色慢慢等佢出碟... 最後修改時間: 2010-04-10 22:56:47 |
vt75 正式會員 75.xxx.xxx.143 |
2010-04-10 22:52 |
| [#103] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 found information from the following link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Stream_Digita "Because of the nature of sigma-delta converters, one cannot make a direct comparison between DSD and PCM. An approximation is possible, though, and would place DSD in some aspects comparable to a PCM format that has a bit depth of 20 bits and a sampling frequency of 96 kHz [2]. PCM sampled at 24 bits provides a (theoretical) additional 24 dB of dynamic range. Because it has been extremely difficult to carry out DSP operations (for example performing EQ, balance, panning and other changes in the digital domain) in a 1-bit environment, and because of the prevalence of studio equipment such as Pro Tools, which is solely PCM-based, the vast majority of SACDs — especially rock and contemporary music which relies on multitrack techniques — are in fact mixed in PCM (or mixed analog and recorded on PCM recorders) and then converted to DSD for SACD mastering" |
batmanames04 正式會員 111.xxx.xxx.28 |
2010-04-10 20:28 |
| [#102] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 BSO is hard to going back to their peak at the time of Munch and Ozawa. James Levine would be terrific at MET opera but I feel reserved of his performance in classical and romantic period repertoire. Mravinsky account is good at recording and performance since its vinyl heyday, meticulous DSD remastering might help audiophiles or music lover to listen the optimal sound quality from original mastertape. Irrelevant to the format, IMHO the engineers behind the console determines what kind of sound we audiophiles or music lovers would hear. |
george1977 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.107 |
2010-03-17 11:54 |
| [#101] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 Such a lot discussed in such a short time. It's really difficult to follow. But there are some points I don't quite agree. For example the Esoteric SACDs are the best SACDs I have acquired so far including the Mravinsky's Tchaikovsky 4,5,6 symphonies bought today. Both sonics and performance are great. I would say it is really worth the extra money. On the other hand the Channel Classics Mahler 4 I still don't think that the sonics is that good. True the brass and woodwinds are caught better than before but the image is out of proportion to the strings making it not natural. I intentionally dig out the earlier Channel classics Mahler 2 and 6 and compare. I find that the layout in Mahler2&6 is much better than the recent Mahler 4 which is recorded with the Grimm ADDA. The question I've got in mind is "Is this new recordings made intentionally for multichannels instead of 2 channel so the integration back to 2 channel was not done careful enough?" Or is the recording team still not yet accustomed to the new Grimm AD? Anyway I do think that taking the Esoteric SACD as an example a carefully done transfer and remastering can end up in great results and is probably worth the extra cost. I am interested in the Daphne & Chloe by the BSO but I am a bit reluctant to buy SACDs through the internet because the postage is unreasonably expensive in general. And BSO has been pretty quiet for a long time and it seems they can never got back to the level before Ozawa? |
Mahler 正式會員 116.xxx.xxx.211 |
2010-03-17 00:39 |
| [#100] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 good discussions with no name calling, except my name was mentioned :-) |
cpu8088 正式會員 115.xxx.xxx.214 |
2010-03-16 12:10 |
| [#99] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 CAS majority would rather listen to 24/96 samplers downloaded from the Inernet than real music, only to show off their latest PC soundcard. ----------------------------------------- I listen to live music or live recording archiv wow, how come do you know that I only listen to 24/96? what a jest! See you again offend CAS users lah! ^.^ |
george1977 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.107 |
2010-03-16 11:06 |
| [#98] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 then you better listen to Pierre Monteux account instead, though David Hurwitz is a responsible record reviewer, frankly speaking the accounts of Monteux, Abbado and Munch played much better than Levine. We have another "C&P king" after cpu8088 ^.^ 最後修改時間: 2010-03-16 11:12:05 |
george1977 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.107 |
2010-03-16 11:03 |
| [#97] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 Amen! Dedicated audiophiles would rather listen to silence than bad sound; record collectors will put up with awful sound if the music is worth listening to. As your member name is self-explantory ------- CAS majority would rather listen to 24/96 samplers downloaded from the Inernet than real music, only to show off their latest PC soundcard. |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.144 |
2010-03-16 11:02 |
| [#96] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 Yes but only those who care to spend $10 buying a SACD of Boston Symphony Orchestra disregarding performance quality. -------- well that's just your opinion, I personally agree with David Hurwitz and find the performance of Daphnis to be very satisfactory http://www.classicstoday.com/review.asp?ReviewNum=12187 |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.144 |
2010-03-16 10:59 |
| [#95] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 as long as there people who care about music and sound quality SACD will survive, in disc form, or disc-less as Mahler suggested. ------------------------------------------ Yes but only those who care to spend $10 buying a SACD of Boston Symphony Orchestra disregarding performance quality. Amen! Dedicated audiophiles would rather listen to silence than bad sound; record collectors will put up with awful sound if the music is worth listening to. As your member name is self-explantory 最後修改時間: 2010-03-16 10:52:33 |
george1977 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.107 |
2010-03-16 10:50 |
| [#94] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 Cheers! |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.144 |
2010-03-16 10:45 |
| [#93] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 as long as there people who care about music and sound quality SACD will survive, in disc form, or disc-less as Mahler suggested. |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.144 |
2010-03-16 10:45 |
| [#92] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 yes, IMHO it's a sad fact that people can't do the math and realize that record labels selling downloads for $18 are ripping people off. ----------------------------------------------- Never mind! I have my opinion, you have your opinion! SACD can only survive by your guys endless and devoted contribution ^.^ 最後修改時間: 2010-03-16 10:37:55 |
george1977 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.107 |
2010-03-16 10:36 |
| [#91] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 IMHO your allegation is going too far! a sad fact? -------- yes, IMHO it's a sad fact that people can't do the math and realize that record labels selling downloads for $18 are ripping people off. |
audioholik 正式會員 95.xxx.xxx.144 |
2010-03-16 10:32 |
| [#90] SACD & 24bit/96hz file 的比較 I've never heard any SACDs done with prism, today grimm audio adc sets the benchmark for DSD2,8MHz encoding. ------------------------------------- There is,ADA-8XR multi-channel modular AD/DA converter  最後修改時間: 2010-03-16 10:31:38 |
george1977 正式會員 61.xxx.xxx.107 |
2010-03-16 10:30 |
