兩聲道
CD機 | MD機 | SACD機 | DAC | CAS | 合拼擴音機 | 前級擴音機 | 後級擴音機 | 接線 | 喇叭線 | 揚聲器 | 耳機 | 耳機擴音機 | LP產品 | 膽機產品 | 開卷式錄音機 | 音響配件 | DIY音響 | 電源 | 家庭影院
電視機 | 投影機 | 錄影機 | DVD影碟機 | Blu-ray影碟機 | 多媒體播放器 | 機頂盒 | 多聲道擴音機 | 多聲道揚聲器 | 多聲道影音組合 | Mini音響組合 | 重低音揚聲器 | 輔助設備 | 同好會
同好會 | Accuphase | B&W | Burmester | Denon | Jadis | KEF | KRELL | Luxman | Marantz | Nuforce | OPPO | Pioneer | TEAC | WEISS | News
News | Blog | 其他
其他 | 所有 |
| 影音天地主旨 ﹝請按主旨作出回應﹞ 上頁 下頁 首頁 尾頁 | 寄件者 | 傳送日期
|
| [#8923] 英倫再上路 Yes... R33 的確曾經係一個熱熱鬧鬧，嘈嘈吵吵，但卻真能包容和而不同嘅地方。。。(yes... 多熟悉的感覺同記憶。。。) GOOD OLD DAYS! Fotheringay 兄，究竟你把火燒咗你幾多個 R33 accounts...?? 哈~~ ^_＜ |
springroll 正式會員83.xxx.xxx.145 |
2026-05-29 01:24 | |
|
|
|||
| [#8924] 英倫再上路 In response to Springroll's comment that "你呢啲唔係叫打大佬，係叫蝦大佬。。。！;P.......播呢啲簡單靚人聲樂器，大喇叭佔唔到好多便宜！...." |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 01:29 |
| [#8925] 英倫再上路 Test 2 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 01:32 |
| [#8926] 英倫再上路 Test 3 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 01:34 |
| [#8927] 英倫再上路 Test 4 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 01:35 |
| [#8928] 英倫再上路 Test 5 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 01:36 |
| [#8929] 英倫再上路 Test 6 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 01:37 |
| [#8930] 英倫再上路 Mooooon |
hahayanyan 正式會員 86.xxx.xxx.153 |
2026-05-29 03:09 |
| [#8931] 英倫再上路 哈哈～～ 原諒小弟多口。。Fotheringay 兄！我唔係特登找你碴。。。我只係認為唔同 size 同 design 嘅喇叭的確各有强弱同擅長嘅音樂類型，播一啲單純人聲加幾件樂器，有更全面全頻覆蓋及動態嘅大喇叭未必可以展現其優勢去大幅碾壓細喇叭喺呢類音樂嘅表現，尤其以呢類為强項嘅 3/5a。 Anyway, 多謝分享咁多咁長。。。。詳。。。。盡嘅錄音比較！你有得玩，我哋有得聽，all win win！yeah! 真係好多好長，我未聽哂，只係聽咗 test 1 & 2；但有樣我十分有興趣分享我嘅聽感嘅嘢，係關於對 3/5a 有 grill mesh 同無 grill mesh 嘅分別！out of my surprise，加咗 grill mesh 嘅 3/5a 出黎嘅聲係直接咗，響亮咗，反而無 grill mesh 時會聽到多咗啲 reverb...?! 一個我事先完全估唔到會聽到有咁嘅效果分別。。。fotheringay 兄，呢兩個錄音 settings 同 volume 有無adjust 過？如果無，呢個加 grill mesh 嘅調音效果的確十分有趣！邊個好聲啲。。。。？depends on your preference。; ) |
springroll 正式會員 83.xxx.xxx.145 |
2026-05-29 16:36 |
| [#8932] 英倫再上路 Springroll, I think we all share the same mutual respect and understanding........so no such thing as 原諒小弟多口.......唔係特登找你碴....... In fact I do appreciate and enjoy such inputs as it makes us much more closer and after all we having fun. They all, LS3/5A, BC1 and BC3, are with the same volume. If there is difference between them it could be the result of positioning the three Mics. LS3/5A would be closer and BC3 would be the most further away and apart. |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 16:57 |
| [#8933] 英倫再上路 From AI; Yes, you should absolutely play the legendary BBC LS3/5A with the original Tygan grill mesh on. The classic monitors were famously designed, tuned, and balanced by ear by the BBC Engineering Department to be listened to with the grills in place. The Case for the Grills----- Voicing: The speaker's crossover is specifically balanced to account for the acoustic properties of the grill cloth. Removing them can make the treble—especially in the 3-5 kHz presence region—sound bright, slightly harsh, or overly forward. Driver Protection: The thin Tygan mesh is acoustically transparent, but it crucially protects the highly delicate driver domes (especially the frail Mylar tweeters) from curious fingers, pets, and everyday accidents. Dispersion: The fabric helps stop sound waves from reflecting off the sharp, protruding corners of the front baffle, which creates a smoother, more cohesive off-axis response. Why Some Listeners Experiment... Visuals: Many audiophiles prefer to take the covers off simply to admire the vintage KEF woofer and tweeter components. Perceived Clarity: In certain treated rooms or with very specific high-end tube amplifiers, some listeners feel removing the mesh yields an airier or more detailed top end. The Verdict... While audio preference is subjective, the consensus among LS3/5A purists is to leave the grills on for the truest, most natural tonal balance. Because the speaker itself relies on precise mid-range and balanced upper registers, the grills are essential to getting that signature BBC "magic". For tips on how to properly position your LS3/5A monitors in a listening space to maximize their famous imaging and soundstage, this video explores speaker setup and in-room behavior: BTW, the Tygan grill mesh is not cloth material but nylon. BBC chose nylon materials is because of Acoustic Transparency, Durability and Consistent Quality. 最後修改時間: 2026-05-29 17:36:16 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-29 17:23 |
| [#8934] 英倫再上路 |
hahayanyan 正式會員 86.xxx.xxx.153 |
2026-05-29 23:50 |
| [#8935] 英倫再上路 Friday night. 最後修改時間: 2026-05-30 06:06:35 |
springroll 正式會員 83.xxx.xxx.145 |
2026-05-30 06:06 |
| [#8936] 英倫再上路 有個咁嘅 Desperado..... kakaka [24/96空気録音] Desperado - Diana Krall (HK AV Show 202508091600 RmS424 玻璃CD/Crystal Disc Demo2) |
Dynavector 正式會員 89.xxx.xxx.13 |
2026-05-30 06:20 |
| [#8937] 英倫再上路 about...moon............................... |
hahayanyan 正式會員 86.xxx.xxx.153 |
2026-05-30 18:17 |
| [#8938] 英倫再上路 Christopher Nolan "The Odyssey" will be coming out soon this summer. Recently there have been lot of rumours that Nolan left his longterm wife Emma Thompson for the sex change Eillot Page. I sincerely doubt it but I am not surprised since you could never tell the truth these days. To begin with I wasn't too optimistic about "The Odyssey" purely because of this ancient old story. I prefer Nolan's original script with his own ideas. I could be wrong. However, I am becoming more and more excited with the ideas behind making the movie. I am extremely excited to know that Nolan shot the whole film in analogue IMAX format. This is the first time in movie industry to be done in this way. I have always thought of Nolan as the new Stanley Kubrick. Two very distinctive directors from their generation to put the technological and ideas to the limit with their films. Kubrick deployed high speed lenses made by Zeiss. Stanley Kubrick and cinematographer John Alcott used the Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f/0.7 originally manufactured by German optics company Zeiss in 1966 for NASA’s Apollo lunar program. Nolan uses the IMAX and forced IMAX to modify the system to make it quiet. As a keen and casual film photographer myself it would be nice to see the elite industry is going back to the root where it started. To be honest with you I wasn't hopeful with "The Odyssey" but I can't wait now. On the sideline I also consider the Canadian director Denis Villeneuve could be the next potential to follow Kubrick and Nolan. I hope his next project with James Bond would bring some flares to the old franchise. An abstract from 60 Minutes with Nolan. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1614622616307011 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-30 18:22 |
| [#8939] 英倫再上路 Hi Springroll, 其實我係一個柔情似水嘅人。 我聽Sonata 俾任何其他音樂還要多。 打波先嚟落雨， 出街先嚟爆軚！ Well…..補胎囉，一首Beethoven coral fantasy 搞掂佢.  |
Mainlanddefender 會員 146.xxx.xxx.55 |
2026-05-30 19:08 |
| [#8940] 英倫再上路 A question for all digital format users, be it CD, HiRes Streaming and Sate-of-the-art DAC's. Do we need 32-bit/384 kHz DACs? My ZOOM H4e records 32/96, my two DAC's can handle up to 24/192. When I record the music from my garage with the Zoom H4e the output will be 32/96 by default. However, I only put videos up to HD (1080p) so it will be waste of hard drive space and not benefit the quality when shown on Youtube. So I will downsample the music files to 24/96 only. When converting my vinyl with the H4e I will keep the same data format for the same storage reason. When I send digital files to my friends they all just want 16/44.1, same as CD, as they don't believe the bigger the better. So Springroll, Dyna San and haHa, will you go for 32/384 as a must as vivid digital files user? https://www.headphonesty.com/2024/01/32-bit-384-khz-dacs-make-little-sense/?utm_source=fb&utm_campaign=comment  最後修改時間: 2026-05-30 20:55:09 |
fotheringay 正式會員 92.xxx.xxx.149 |
2026-05-30 20:51 |
| [#8941] 英倫再上路 For converting cd into files..or the capture of the hifi session. ..even 16bits seem to be fine Haha but if one day I capture some live guitar playing or a buddy playing drum...32 bits is wiser , potentially..better dynamic |
hahayanyan 正式會員 86.xxx.xxx.153 |
2026-05-30 22:48 |
| [#8942] 英倫再上路 ...Do we need 32-bit/384 kHz DACs? A must? NO. Nice to have? Yes. 事實上，市面上 available 而又係真正 32/384 audio format quality 唔單止唔多，正頭係寥寥可數，基本上只係針對 audiophile。。。同埋有不少 32/384 都只係由 lower bitrate upsample 出黎，音質跟真 32/384 仲有段距離，而 upsample 出黎亦未必好過自然過 original bitrate source... 所以 32/384 is not a must for now，因為根本無乜得俾你播，自己愛黎 upsample 玩吓就無妨，同埋如果部 dac 自己有埋 upsample 功能嘅話，即係話佢嘅 processing power 都會强啲，對重播 original hi-res bitrate source 嘅 overall performance 係會有啲幫助，though subtle ...(因近呢十年八載嘅 cpu 對重播等閒 hi-res 已經夠哂强勁) 你而家嘅錄音器材設定，以 32/96 錄 is good for recording the dynamics and post processing. Final audio 轉換儲存番成 24/96 應該係足夠亦係最好嘅方案，既 preserve the recording quality，檔案亦細得多。; ) All the above is according to my limited knowledge. ^_^ |
springroll 正式會員 83.xxx.xxx.145 |
2026-05-31 04:07 |
